X-Message-Number: 26690 From: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:58:26 EDT Subject: comparisons & perspectives Someone asked about the number of fully signed up members CI has, and then offered his own assessment of the numbers. Ben is out of town. My own view includes the following. As to the alleged membership numbers, I don't have those handy, but they are less important than some other considerations. Certainly one of the most important numbers is the patient population, and Cryonics Institute has a slight lead there, according to available figures, 68 to 67. The top consideration, for those who can afford it, is probable quality of cryopreservation. This is a long and complicated story, but as far as the available evidence indicates, there is no clear or proven leader. CI has the best professional research program, although we are told that Alcor is making efforts to catch up there. Perhaps the next consideration is future prospects of growth. In the past, Alcor has attracted more of the wealthy, by claiming to be top of the line. CI has gained more of the unprepared emergencies, both because of lower prices and because of better response. The perception of quality is changing, because of CI's vitrification advances, and possibly also because of CI's agreement making Suspended Animation services available to CI members. Nobody is stagnant, and future relative changes cannot be predicted with confidence. I hope and believe that both will do well, and absolute growth is more important than relative growth. (ACS is also still active, and Trans Time is still in business.) Once we reach the big growth-spurt point, at some unknown future time, there will be many changes, including more active opposition on the one hand, and more new competition on the other. Maybe General Electric will become the big player, or some new heavyweight. That will be all to the good. The main thing for the individual, as always, is to make a commitment while you still can. Robert Ettinger Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=26690