X-Message-Number: 27011
From: "Jordan Sparks" <>
Subject: RE: cemetery
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:35:46 -0700

Yes.  I thought I made that clear.  Perfusion is to be done by a
licensed embalmer at a licensed funeral home.  Relevant laws DO exist
and I refuse to ignore them.  It would be nice if the law was altered to
also allow physicians to perform perfusions.

I am not ill-informed.  I have been reading the history of cryonics and
watching the Arizona situation develop for the last 15 years.  My
opinion was reached after many many years of watching Alcor, CI, and
others.  I'm not ill-informed; I just have an opinion that is different
from yours.  I completely understand that others do not share my
opinion.  Do I care what others' opinions are?  Only to a degree.  A
person certainly doesn't consider cryonics unless they have an unusually
capacity to think for themselves regardless of the prevailing opinion.

Jordan Sparks
 

-----Original Message-----

Apparently your lawyer has given you appallingly bad advice.

Since CI was reclassified as a cemetery, they have lost the capability
to perform procedures in house. Is that your objective too? You want to
be prohibited from performing cryoprotective perfusion, for instance? As
a cemetery, you can store people. Period.

You are ill-informed. I suggest you read some cryonics
history.

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27011