X-Message-Number: 27076 References: <> From: Peter Merel <> Subject: A Thought Experiment Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:18:21 +1000 Beth Bailey writes, > I agree with you Peter, FDR was right. I wish the "Four Freedoms" > were still part of the political debate taking place throughout the > world. Not many have argued against FDR on principle. The devilish difficult problem is how to make his freedoms real. As Thomas has written, the implementation of the peace was very far from perfect or perfectionist. Short term political intents intervened and that was that. We cryonicists are uniquely motivated to consider the long term. If the 4 freedoms are essential to our future, we should talk about the effects of our actions, for good or ill, in this light. I'd like to propose this as a thought experiment for earnest cryonicists: Imagine living 200 years ago, expecting to be reborn today; how could you have acted to ameliorate the troubles we've experienced? What could you have said or done, and to whom, to truly alter the way things are now? > By nature or nurture, there are evil people in the world who would > kill you just as soon as look in your direction. People kill for reasons. The obvious reason for the 9/11 attack is the US-led invasions and blockades that have murdered millions of innocents over the last two decades. It's not surprising the survivors of our victims fight back asymmetrically. How else could they fight back? > I refuse to accept what you say, "If there are evil people, it's > us." No one in those airplanes (with the exeption of the Al Queda > scum) and no one in the WTC towers or Pentagon deserved to die, or > be maimed that day, for the crime of getting up in the morning and > going to work. "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing" -- Edmund Burke, a British sympathizer to the American revolution. A succession of Western governments have committed mass murder in the middle east. And the WTC victims, and you, I, and the rest of cryonet, have done nothing. What policy would genuinely promote civilization in the middle east? These people are not savages - read http://www.talkorigins.org/ origins/postmonth/jun04.html#p2 . Could we set up, say, a series of UN-based missions to feed and educate a generation of secularized civilized people there? Something like http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki? SchoolsForCivilization ? Or if the US spent its budget on alternative petrochemical technology - algal biodiesel, say - instead of military adventures, could the terrorists become economically disempowered? Would they return to their old tribal conflicts with no motive for aggression against the USA? Is the best solution to terror simply to end oil dependence on the middle east? For myself I believe to achieve any constructive solution to terror, we must start with ourselves. Establish a humane way of life in America and lead the rest of the world by example. If we want to remove their motes, we must start with our beams. Peter Merel. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27076