X-Message-Number: 27143 References: <> From: Kennita Watson <> Subject: Re: life insurance Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:09:48 -0700 It may be a non-issue now, but what happens after an animal is revived, and someone suggests that cryonics patients ought not be issued death certificates because they aren't necessarily dead? Looking ahead, what about when the first person is revived and restored to health? What about when restoration becomes commonplace? That will certainly change the actuarial tables. Then again, so will having more and more people who are 70 or 80 or 100 with the bodies and minds of 30-year-olds. Then there's the matter of the person with trusted family who takes out a 5 million dollar life insurance policy on herself, goes out and dies doing something dangerous, is revived and restored, and walks away with the cash? I guess the money would be payment for the risk that the suspension wouldn't be done well, but I'd imagine the insurance industry would rather that sort of gamble not become common -- at least not if the restored person were eligible to buy a new insurance policy and play again. At this point, my mind is getting more twisted around what happens to the life insurance industry once cryonics patients can be reliably revived than I can coherently think about, much less articulate, at this time of the morning, so I'll leave further speculation as an exercise for the reader :-) . Live long and prosper, Kennita Robert Ettinger wrote: > Kennita Watson worries that life insurance companies may refuse to > pay off > on cryonics cases, because they might be revived. > > Can't happen. They pay off on a death certificate, and our > patients have > death certificates. And the insurance companies feel no pain--the > actuarial > statistics are unchanged. Then Rudi Hoffman wrote: > The concern about a "reversal" of a death benefit due to > resuscitation of > our "patients" is a non-issue. > > As far as the inscos, and most of the (less well educated) world is > concerned, a "death certificate" is a permanent and final statement > of condition. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27143