X-Message-Number: 27149
From: 
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:48:42 EDT
Subject: Re: Bryan Hall Reference, life insurance "chargebacks"

In a message dated 9/29/2005 5:00:32 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
 writes:

Message  #27146
From: "Bryan Hall" <>
Subject:  Missing Persons / Life Insurance
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:44:52  -0700

This is a helpful paper concerning "missing persons" and life  insurance:

http://fdcc.digitalbay.net/documents/Sentell-W04.htm

-Bryan

Rate  This Message: _http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27146_ 
(http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27146) 





(Rudi Writing)
 
As usual, my friend Bryan Hall has provided a relevant and probative  link.
 
While the above link does not clarify all the possible questions regarding  
what COULD happen on cryonics cases, the overarching tone is pretty clear.

Basically, insurance companies (inscos) don't like and don't want to  pay for 
FRAUD.  
 
Since I use only inscos who have put IN WRITING, ON COMPANY LETTERHEAD,  WITH 
EXECUTIVE APPROVAL, that they have NO problem with cryonics as a concept,  

the possibility of these inscos asking for their death benefit back when and if
you are rescusitated is vanishingly small.  
 
But, as Kennita and others have pointed out, as time goes by things could  
change.
 
 
Which is why I issued my correction, and made my views on this more  
provisional.
 
Thanks, Bryan, for your link.  
 
This should probably put this thread to bed for a few years at  least. 
 
What MIGHT be more relevant is the surprising fact that after 2 years most  
inscos pay even if you suicide.  This may be VERY important  if cryonics 
vendors were allowed by public policy to allow voluntary  deanimation.  
 
Let's talk about something like why there aren't more scientists like  

Pichugan, Wowk, and Fahy working on organ and whole body vitrification.   And 
what 
we can individually and collectively do to change this for the  better.  
 
Kind Regards,
 
Rudi


 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27149