X-Message-Number: 27487 From: Subject: Book Review: BRAIN FREEZE - 321 F by J.P. Polidoro Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:51:41 GMT Book Review: BRAIN FREEZE - 321 F by J.P. Polidoro Reviewed by Ben Best The novel BRAIN FREEZE - 321 F strikes me as a sustained attack on cryonics. If cryonicists are an ethnic group, I regard this as a classic piece of hate literature. The novel is a parody of the cryopreservation of Ted Williams by the cryonics organization Alcor. The true wishes of Ted Williams to be cryopreserved were not as well documented as they should have been (although two out of three of Ted's children gave sworn statements to the court that their father really wanted to be cryopreserved). The author is apparently one of those who chose to believe the third (estranged) child, and this may be the source of his hostility. Although Alcor is at the bullseye of the attack, I believe the author is deeply contemptuous of all cryonics and cryonics organizations. The Prologue deals largely with an Alcor view of the news that Michigan had labeled cryonics facilities as cemeteries because of the State's view that frozen corpses were in fact dead that cryonics was merely the freezing of a corpse. The book contains many sections devoted to an attempt to debunk the science behind cryonics which I want to discuss before reviewing the story & style of the novel. In my view, the author's ignorance of biomedical science and his misconceptions of cryonics technology make him into an inept debunker. Additionally, the references to science are laden with emotional expressions of disgust. Vitrification is characterized as a glassing effect of frozen internment that turns the skin yellow and causes the investigative journalist in the story to vomit. The journalist has another episode of nausea upon contemplating a body thawing and exuding a mixture of cell contents and vitrification solution. Repeatedly the author seems to understand and not understand that the water replacement of vitrification eliminates all ice formation. The process is deemed irrational because it eliminates the water required for vital processes like oxygenation and ion transport. And yet the author refers to blood vessels bursting upon freezing and invokes the image of a frozen strawberry turning to mush after being thawed. The author presents the worst of both worlds the freezing damage that comes from water and the lack of vital function that comes from the removal of water to eliminate freezing. The reader is authoritatively told that the toxicity due to cryoprotectants is irreversible. The author focuses repeatedly glycerol, as if that is what is used for vitrification. The author confusedly describes the blood brain barrier as the tight cellular junctions between each brain cell and neuron (the BBB is actually tight junctions of endothelial cells). He says that the BBB is a barrier which would prevent large vitrification molecules from reaching the brain (false). For this reason, water in the cerebrospinal fluid would fracture the brain. The author would presumably be stunned to learn that at the 2005 meeting of the Society of Cryobiology a cryobiologist announced that he had vitrified a rabbit kidney to -135oC and transplanted the kidney into a rabbit (after rewarming and cryoprotectant washout) with full kidney functionality. The description of cryonics protocol is no less confused. The injection of heparin is deemed a futile exercise because the blood does not circulate after death. This purported non-circulation of blood in a cryonics patient is cited as the smoking gun in the Dora Kent case because of metabolized barbiturate found in her body which could only have been metabolized by a functioning circulatory system to transport the drug to the liver (meaning she was killed by barbiturate injection). Despite this apparent ignorance of cardiopulmonary support to maintain circulation in a cryonics patient, the author uses the phrase cardiopulmonary support to describe blood replacement with organ preservation solution in preparation for transport to the cryonics facility. Once at the cryonics facility the patient gets deanimated (a process which the author seems to confuse with vitrification perfusion). A heart-lung machine roller pump administers cryoprotectant while the patient is immersed in chilled silicone oil. The head is separated from the body using garden tools under abysmally non-sterile conditions, and placed into a lobster pot. A professional pathologist disgustedly informs the investigative journalist in the novel that severing the spinal cord is irreversible and makes no sense. In any case, death is final. Despite this reference to the finality of death, cryonics is repeatedly described as human vivisection. It would be far too time-consuming to explain to laypeople everything that is wrong with the author's mishmash of misconceptions. But even those with a smattering of knowledge of cryonics technology can probably appreciate the ignorance of the author from the above description. What the author misses in his lame-brained attempts to discredit cryonics science he attempts to compensate for with name-calling. In his parade of epithets cryonics is lunatic fringe, an unscrupulous travesty, a hoax, beyond science fiction totally lacking in scientific merit and universally vilified by those in science and medicine. The author would undoubtedly be shocked to see the Scientists' Open Letter on Cryonics. http://www.cryoletter.org/ Although the author did his homework on cryonics history, he was a mediocre student. He refers to cryonics facilities in Europe and describes Steven Mandell as a man who ran a failed cryonics organization in New York. I believe that the purpose of this novel is to incite hostility against cryonics and cryonicists, portraying cryonicists as contemptible. The author struggles to present cryonicists as both deluded freaks and racketeers who victimize the elderly (which would imply that cryonicists do not really believe in cryonics). The author does not really resolve the dilemma, but makes a weak attempt to present cryonics as a cult of deluded followers who are in the hypnotic spell of a demi-god. The cult leader in the novel is Justin Clement, MD, the CEO of the Arizona cryonics company Mizaronics. An important part of the cryopreservation protocol is at the end of the procedure when the perfusion team gathers in a circle with bowed heads and recites in unison a credo that expresses disdain for nonbelievers and the vision of being revived in a second coming. Characters in a novel are puppets in the hands of the novelist, so it is not surprising that Dr. Clement is arrogant, rude and insulting. The author editorializes dialog in a way I have never seen before: 'I have no comment on anything anything you have asked or stated,' Clement reiterated with absurdity. Clement spends his time away from work with expensive prostitutes until one of his employees, fearing for her job, gives him oral sex in his office. Although the novel was clearly inspired by the Ted Williams case, the frozen star in the novel is a black baseball player ( Reggie Sanford ) who struggled to establish himself in face of the racial barriers of the early days of baseball. Although Mizaronics is proud to have the black baseball hero, Dr. Clement does not hesitate to use the N word . The implication that cryonicists are racists is less significant than the emphasis on the indignity of cryonics procedures applied to such a great man who had already arisen above persecution. This device also allows Ted Williams to be a living figure in the novel where he can express his true feelings of absolute contempt for the crazy and disgraceful practice of cryonics repeatedly and profanely. Being cryopreserved is regarded in this novel the same way Americans regarded the 1993 dragging of the bodies of killed US soldiers through the streets of Somalia, where they were subjected to abuse and refuse. Unlike the Ted Williams case, which involved a dispute between children of the cryopreserved parent, Reggie Sanford is cryopreserved by his only son. Although Reggie had requested cremation in his Last Will and Testament, the son had discussed cryonics with his father and they had made a verbal pact that the father would be cryopreserved. The author clearly believes that the written document takes priority and gives no credence that verbal agreements can express true wishes. Unlike the Ted Williams case, there is no complication of an oil-stained note or the fact that two children gave sworn testimony of a pact with their father for cryopreservation. Reggie's son had requested whole body preservation, but the perfusion team accidently began a neuro procedure. In the confused mind of the author this somehow prevented proper perfusion of the brain. (If a neuro procedure is accidently begun, why wouldn't it continue in the usual fashion. The author's confusion is hard to fathom.) So the perfusion team drilled about nine holes in Reggie's head in a feeble attempt to inject cryoprotectant through the holes. Then the mutilated head and torso of Reggie are stashed in the ghastly chamber of frozen absurdity deprived of dignified finality. Not only was the great man's body desecrated, but his fans were left without a proper place to put flowers. (The author is untroubled about the fact that cremation could have the same result if ashes are scattered.) The mutilation of Reggie's body might have remained a secret even to Reggie's son had it not been for a brave young Mizaronics employee named Jonathan who risked his job by going to an investigative journalist named Rachel to expose the dastardly deed. Jonathan is fired and subjected to death-threats, spray-painting of his apartment with graffiti and other abuse. He is accused of stealing confidential photos and documents. To add spice to the story, however, Jonathan and Rachel become beautiful lovers. And Ted Williams congratulates Jonathan for rising above personal need to do something noble for a great cause. In the middle of the night a pair of commandos moves with skill and precision to take the Mizaronics night watchman by surprise, blast their way into the building and make away with the head of Reggie Sanford leaving a bumper sticker that says Free Reggie . The depiction of the commandos is an extraordinary piece of confused characterization for a novelist. He portrays them as both idealists and extortionists. Why would they demand money and the release of Reggie's torso in exchange for Reggie's head? Why could they not have taken both the head and the torso in such a skillfully-executed raid? The commandos then abduct Rachel and take her to their squalid shack where she is raped and abused. Pregnant with Jonathan's child, Rachel forced herself to comply with their demands to prevent injury to the baby. The expert commandos have been transformed into incompetent, disgusting slobs who negligently allow Reggie's head to thaw and then try to cremate it in a pot. The extortionists then demand the exchange of Rachel for Reggie's torso. It is unclear how the extortionists are expected to benefit from this exchange unless it is a noble effort on their part to free Reggie and cremate his torso as they did with his head (which reportedly had not been their original intention). Reggie's son had come to his senses and demanded the release of his father's torso in respect for his father's written wishes. Dr. Clement would not respond to the son's attorney and he refused to exchange the torso for Rachel's life. Clement added that Rachel was to blame for the consequences of her reprehensible journalism. Jonathan, under the mistaken impression that Rachel had been killed, hijacked a freshly fueled Mizaronics corporate jet and flew it into the Mizaronics facility, incinerating it completely, along with himself. A SWAT team located Rachel, killing one of her abductors and arresting the other. When the families of the cryonics patients sued Mizaronics, Dr. Clement went into hiding. This might be a happy ending for the author, but the reader is left with the tragedy of Jonathan, Rachel and their unborn child fulfilling the author's apparent purpose of leaving the reader with more reasons to despise the cryonicists who are to blame. The cartoon characterizations of cryonics science and of cryonicists presented in this book are light-years from reality. A valid critique would accurately represent the science & technology of cryonics and would present cryonicists as they are (at worst deluded, but sincere), not as cultists with evil motives. However, in my opinion the impetus for writing this book was the author's perception that Ted Williams did not really want to be cryopreserved. I think that cryonicists should make great efforts to ensure that the only people who are cryopreserved are those who have documented those wishes indisputable particularly celebrities. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27487