X-Message-Number: 27671 References: <> From: Kennita Watson <> Subject: Re: Charles Platt's comments on "FDGD Press Release Accepted by PRWeb" Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 16:01:17 -0800 Charles Platt <> wrote: > Message #27670 > Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 23:55:47 -0500 (EST) > From: Charles Platt <> > Subject: Re: CryoNet #27667 > References: <> > >> Message #27667 >> From: Kennita Watson <> >> Subject: FDGD Press Release Accepted by PRWeb >> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:04:12 -0800 > >> Cryonicists at Frozen Dead Guy Festival Claim: "Not All >> Frozen Guys Are Dead!" > > "Cryonicists," plural? You mean there is now more than one of > you? A sobering thought. FTR: Yes, there is more than one -- as there was last year. I hope to have others join me at other events in future. > > In my days as a journalist, if I had received a "press > release" such as yours, it would have automatically gone into > the "lone eccentric" category. Journalists are innately > skeptical and any attempt to convince them that you are > really not a loony will merely be a source of mild amusement. Also FTR: My press release is not sent to anyone. It is posted on PRWeb, and viewed/etc. by whomever finds it interesting. Also FTR: The Release Date was March 4, 2006. As of March 5, 2006, 1545 PST, PRWeb reported my statistics thus: Reads 37,265 This number tells you how many times your press release was accessed from our site and other distribution points where we have the ability to measure a click through. This number does not include the number of journalists who have received your release through email. In addition there are online distribution points that we currently have no ability to track. Estimated Pickup 356 This number estimates the number of times your press release was picked up by a media outlet. This does not tell you how many times your story appears in the media. It simply attempts to estimate media interest of your release. Prints 20 This is the number of times that someone has printed your press release. We measure this by the number of times that the "printer friendly version" link is pressed. In reality, only a small percentage of users actually click this link before printing a release. I'm happy with this. Reasonable pickup for small-town news on a fringe topic. Probably the best thing any of you could do is to weigh in on the links I list on the Cryonics Advocacy Group Web site. Even if you don't agree with how I'm going about this, I am apparently getting a little media coverage, and will meet hundreds of people over the weekend who will get my URL, and it's in the best interests of the cryonics movement as a whole to have the best information possible available on as many Web sites as possible. Please offer comments about http://cryonicsadvocacy.org . Thanks! Kennita Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27671