X-Message-Number: 27891 From: Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:34:52 EDT Subject: Re: Choosing the Time David Pizer writes that from his experience most people prefer to pass away at home, and are in denial until near the end. Even in such a case, timing your death by going on oxygen until withdrawal will mean rapid deanimation, and doing this with a doctor nearby and an icebath ready is far better than dying at a random time and lying around until death is discovered, a doctor is summoned (and arrives hours later because in his view there is no urgency now) and only then is rescue begun. Also, although I recognize Mr. Pizer's experience, all my family members have died in a hospital or nursing home. In most cases death was expected, they were unconscious or nearly so, they could have been transported, and one facility would have been like any other to them. So I still think some people might prefer to be moved near a cryonics facility. Rudi Hoffman is concerned that we may draw the attention of anti-euth anasia-ists, but what I am discussing is an uncontroversial common practice as far as I know. Doctors often keep terminal patients "alive" until the family can say goodbye, then terminate life support. I have recently become interested in living wills as a way to lower the impossibly-high Medicare shortfall ($30 trillion!) and just read the living will the Veteran's Administration offers everyone at signup. "If [when I am dying] I am unable to participate in decisions...I direct my physician .. to withdraw procedures that merely prolong the dying process.." is their wording. This is exactly what I am talking about, with the withdrawal being at a time when death will ensue promptly. This is done in a plain-vanilla living will from the VA, and so far as I know no mobs with torches are after them. In fact I have spoken with the Patient Advocates about it, and they say most people just fill out the forms and say Thank You. So I see no controversy. Examples the VA gives of life sustaining treatments they willl withdraw include mechanical ventillation, dialysis, artificial nutrition and hydration, antibiotics, transfusions and CPR. Mechanical ventillation is the best of these, but stopping dialysis, nutrition or antibiotics might bring death within a prediction window of a day or less if you kept track of buildup levels. Which would make standby more feasible. What else should we consider? Alan Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=27891