X-Message-Number: 28089 From: "egg plant" <> Subject: RE: CryoNet #28070 - #28078 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:57:20 +0000 Anthony ." <> Wrote: >No regulation means no democracy Yea, but that's OK, I'm not a big fan of democracy anyway because elections are dumb. Elections are an idiotic way of communicating your wishes, there are much better ways. Every day I send hundreds of exquisitely precise messages to the Free Market telling it what I want it to do. I also get to compare brands, I can't do that in a democracy because I'm not voting for goods or services or even policies, I just get to choose between two grab bags of promises every 4 years. When I "vote" in the economy by making a purchase I am sure to get it, I always win. When I vote for the grab bag I may or may not get it. People have figured out that the chance that their vote will influence things is so absurdly small that it's just not worth their time to study the issues very deeply, the result is that the politician with the best hairdo gets to make the decisions. >People do not spend their money very well. And government does? Maybe people spend their money foolishly, maybe they don't, the point is it's THEIR money NOT yours. I can only think of 3 ways to get anybody to do anything, force, love, or trade; government uses the first, people like me tend to like the last two better, if you can think of a fourth I'd love to hear it. >You think that people should spend and consume wantonly And you think you have the right to make me spend money that I earned in a way that pleases you not me. And I think that is evil. >Americans may be the only people who widely embrace a > "dog eat dog" >mentality Speaking of dogs, who is the top dog in the world today, Germany, the Netherlands or America? >our insatiable lust for money and consumption leads to massively >inequitable distribution of the world's wealth Another defining characteristic of the common western socialist is his conviction that money is evil and that the most evil thing about money is that he doesn't have enough of it. >trust me I'm from an honest-to-god corporation Oh I don't trust corporations either, but the difference is I can tell a corporation to go to hell, if I tell government to go to hell I'll end up in jail, or worse. For some reason people love to dwell on the bad things business has done, but if you put all the evil business has committed over the last century together in one big lump I can't find a word stronger than "naughty" to describe it compared to the horrors committed by government. Perhaps Wal-Mart hasn't treated its employees with enough consideration from time to time, but at least Wal-Mart doesn't push them into ovens. I once read a biography of John D Rockefeller by Ron Chernon called "Titan", it was a good book but was supposed to document all the dreadful things he did to become the riches man in the world. Well, if this is as bad as capitalism gets I can only conclude capitalism is not very bad. He was astronomically intelligent, extremely aggressive, and had the uncanny ability to find any economic weakness in a competitor and exploit it to the hilt, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. It's true he sometimes bribed legislatures, but although clearly illegal I didn't find it immoral. At the time there were foolish (and probably unconstitutional) laws forbidding corporations from being involved in intra state commerce, if the law had been obeyed the industrial revolution would not have happened in America; so Rockefeller did the only thing he could, he opened his wallet. I could not find any instances where Rockefeller's business decisions were clearly immoral and only a few that even entered a gray area. The odd thing was that just before I read that book I read a biography of Stalin, before that a biography of Lenin and before that a biography of Hitler, so when Chernon talked about some "evil" thing that Rockefeller did I had to laugh. Compared to those demonic government leaders Rockefeller on his very worst day was no more than naughty. Big government has created a sea of blood and butchered hundreds of millions of people, often their own citizens. Granted, few companies actively opposed those monstrous regimes, but that's not quite the same thing as instigating it, and anyway can you really blame them for not playing the hero, it would be economic if not actual suicide to do so. Yes Microsoft can be arrogant and yes, it makes me mad when Windows crashes too, but at least Bill Gates doesn't put his customers into concentration camps. John K Clark Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=28089