X-Message-Number: 28458 From: "egg plant" <> Subject: Memes and Genes Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:25:59 +0000 Mr. Anthony Autophagy Wrote: >What, then, is the cut-off point? Roughly speaking, which organisms do not >have minds or memes I was wondering when you'd bring up that idiotic argument. You say, correctly, that if you keep making a mind simpler and simpler eventually it would be difficult to say if there was really a mind there or not; but then you conclude that because of that the entire concept must be meaningless. A 80 pound man is thin, a 800 pound man is fat, but you can't point to an exact point and say if this man gains one more ounce he will instantly change from thin to fat. You can't point to an exact nanosecond where day changes into night, but that doesn't mean there is no difference between day and night. In the real would there is seldom a cut-off point between categories, there is a cut-off blob. That reminds me, you once demanded to know what the first meme was. Well ., I'll tell you that just as soon as you tell me what the first gene was, what it did, and if it was made of DNA, RNA, protein, clay, or something else. >To clarify - by "consciousness" I do not mean >"self-awareness" but mindfulness - an proprioceptive awareness that allows >them to act of a basic organismic >level. Translation from the original Pompous-Speak: If you know where your shit's at you can act like an animal. Please note, I make no claim that my translation makes any more sense than the original. Big words are no substitute for big ideas. >I know that "drift" in not uncontroversial, being >both an argument for natural selection and against it It is not controversial that some mutations are harmful some are helpful and some are neutral, it is not controversial that the neutral ones change the genome over time at a pretty constant rate and this change is called genetic drift. And it is not controversial, it is idiotic, to say neutral mutations created language. John K Clark Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=28458