X-Message-Number: 28484 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:17:53 -0400 From: Francois <> Subject: On the difficulties to sell cryonics. I have been musing for some time on the reasons that make cryonics so hard to "sell", and all the different ideas I have been exposed to or have come up with have recently come together is a semi coherent hypothesis. Lets see if I can write down this hypothesis in a way that will make a little sense to those who read it. Essentially, I believe that cryonics is difficult to sell because, although it is not itself a religion, it involves the same very deep psychological mechanisms that religions are based on. Allow me to explain. Humans are unique in two ways that are significant to the problem. First, we have a clear awareness of our own inevitable death. We are mortal and we know it. No other creature experiences this. Second, our awareness of time is not limited to the present. Animals do not dwell on past hardships, nor do they anticipate future ones. They deal with what happens to them in the present. They will react once a crisis presents itself and return to their normal behavior once it is passed. Of course, a dog will react badly if a man who is in the habit of beating him comes in his presence. The dog will "anticipate" the beating because he has "memories" of past beatings inflicted by that man. But if the man is not present, the dog will not worry himself sick at the tought of what he may do to him in the future, or has done to him in the past. Humans will worry themselves sick doing just that. They can even imagine possible future hardships that may or may not happen, or fabricate memories about harships they never experienced in reality. In other words, not only do we have a keen awareness of our own mortality, we carry with us throughout our lives a burden of hardship that spans a whole lifetime, and even more. An illustration of the effect this could have on a sentient mind can be found in the movie Project X. In that movie, the army was studying the effects of exposure to radiation on a fighter pilot in the event of an atomic war. They wanted to know how much exposure to radiation a pilot could sustain and still be effective. They were using chimpanzees as test subjects. In the end the experiment was declared invalid because a chimp would work on his task until radiation sickness physically stopped him, while a human pilot would get demoralized by the knowledge of his certain death and would stop being an effective fighter long before he actually became too sick to fly. The first sentient humans probably had to cope with a similar morale problem. Of course, we also carry a lifetime of good memories during our lives, but I have observed that people tend to dwell on the bad stuff much more than the good stuff, and good memories would still not help with the certain knowledge of our mortality. Something better had to be found, and it was. At the same time humans were evolving sentience, they were also confronted with many subjective phenomena, like dreams, hallucinations, naturally occuring mind altering drugs, temporal lobe epilepsy and other so called altered states of counciousness. These seemed to indicate the existence of another reality inhabited by all sorts of strange entities. It is not uncommon for us to dream of recently departed loved ones. Such dreams often take on a very compelling air of reality and make us feel like we have really been visited by the dead parent or friend. Undoubtedly, this feeling would have been even stronger in the case of the first humans because they really had no experience telling them otherwise. And so, sentience evolved confronted with certain mortality and at the same time with the apparent survival of people beyond death. The first sentient minds were shaped as much by these sujective experiences as they were by the demands of their environment. Something emerged from these interractions, a new and never before seen instinct that could be called faith. Faith can be seen as a veil put by evolution in front of the oblivion abyss we will all enter, sooner or later. It hides that abyss from everyday conciousness, it gives hope and it provides meaning to our existence. To work properly, it cannot be questionned. Since any such questioning will be percieved as an attack on our safety, it will evoke reactions similar to the ones evoked by physical attacks, like running away, anger or outright hostility. In this context, religion can be seen as whatetever a culture chooses to paint over the veil of faith. Religion becomes identified with faith, attacks on religion become attacks on faith itself and therefore attacks on our very lives. The emotional connexions at work here are very strong because they involve our survival instinct, a powerful emotion if there ever was one. What does this have to do with cryonics and the difficulties to "convert" people to it? Well, there is a phrase in the Death in the Deep Freeze video that sums it up very well. "The foundations of society and religion are built on the certainty of death, and cryonics is a practice that strikes at the very core of this notion." In other words, to accept cryonics, one must lift the veil of faith and confront the abyss it hides, and we have hundreds of thousands, possibly even millions of years of evolution that opposes this action with incredible strength. It is not an easy thing to do. It is certainly not something you can "convert" someone to. In order to get someone there, you must guide them gently and allow them to follow their own path or you literally risk destroying their sanity. And you will also at the same time evoke a great ammount of hostility from the general public. This, I'm afraid, is unavoidable. But there is something else in the video that makes me a little more optimistic. It is obvious that cryonics, once accepted, can provide the same sort of meaning and comfort as faith does. You only have to listen to and watch Michael and Anita Riskin to realize that. Unlike faith, cryonics does not hide the oblivion abyss, it provides a way to get through it, it makes it a finite obstacle and puts something attainable beyond it. And unlike faith, it is something physical over which we have some control. With the research being conducted in the domain of cryopreservation, sooner or later someone will succeed in suspending and reviving a complete living creature, dog, rat, monkey, whatever. At that point, cryonics will become a lot more attractive and these facts make me believe that it will someday become much more widely accepted. Until then, it simply cannot compete effectively with faith and religion. It will continue to be opposed by the general public and it will remain the domain of people who manage to accept their inevitable mortality through their own power of reason. That's a rare breed indeed. Francois Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=28484