X-Message-Number: 29335 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:20:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Platt <> Subject: Re: CryoNet #29325 - #29328 References: <> > Message #29328 > From: "marta sandberg" <> > Subject: The ethics of last-minute cases > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:46:55 +0800 > > I have a very serious problem with Chares Platt's. To deny a patient the > right to be frozen if a hostile relative exist will bar at least > three-quarters of the current cases and mean that any relative of mine who > don't like cryonics will have veto power over my choice. This is not what I meant. Sorry I don't have time to go back and look it up now, but either I wasn't clear or Marta Sandberg misunderstood me. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29335