X-Message-Number: 29373 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:27:49 -0700 (PDT) From: un person <> Subject: re: gina miller animation and the cryonics muppets re: Gina's video and the Cryonics Muppets, intended audience, etc - Today, 02:31 PM On alcor united, "Philossifur" wrote: >>>>>>>>> Well, I'll just leave it there. Oh... one more thing. Gina Miller's video is simply awful. She didn't post my remarks to her blog but I DID post my reponse on sci.cryonics.... which makes sci.cryonics THE best conversation area.... for cryonics... in the world right now.... apart from doing one's own blog and getting it on Google blog. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the one she posted the other day, the one with the rabbit that was hiding behind the Easter Island statue? I agree, it was awful--from MY perspectve. She has an ultrafeminine sensibility that just takes me the wrong way. HOWEVER....with a bit more work and extension to that video, a 6 year old kid might find her work absolutely ENTRANCING. Different audiences, different perspectives etc. Adults do not watch saturday morning cartoons for a reason. And if she were to create some sort of cryonics video, kids are a much more receptive audience to our ideas than are adults, and kids are an audience we actually have a good chance of influencing, at least long term. Kids are the future of cryonics growth, not changing adult minds. Mark Plus posted a url of a youtube video the other day. Some kids used hand puppets -- Muppets a la sesame street-- to make a video explaining cryonics. It had a lot of potential, I think. What a great way to reach kids. No need for flash cartoons. Even just one person could create a video of hand puppets talking to each other, and then supplement it with flash video showing geometric shapes and flowcharts etc. to explain basic cryonics concepts. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29373