X-Message-Number: 29418 From: "Mark Plus" <> Subject: Re: Electric supply for CI and Alcor Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:02:56 -0700 David Stodolsky writes, >Proven Reserves of oil have been rising thru out history and continue to do >so. The General Accountabilty Office's new report about Peak Oil draws attention to the problems with this assumption: CRUDE OIL: Uncertainty about Future Oil Supply Makes It Important to Develop a Strategy for Addressing a Peak and Decline in Oil Production February 2007 GAO-07-283 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07283.pdf Regarding OPEC, for example, it states that: "Some experts believe OPEC estimates of proven reserves to be inflated. For example, OPEC estimates increased sharply in the 1980s, corresponding to a change in OPEC's quota rules that linked a member country's production quota in part to its remaining proven reserves. In addition, many OPEC countries' reported reserves remained relatively unchanged during the 1990s, even as they continued high levels of oil production. For example, IEA reports that reserves estimates in Kuwait were unchanged from 1991 to 2002, even though the country produced more than 8 billion barrels of oil over that period and did not make any important new oil discoveries." Moreover, a fifth of the world's oil comes from about 14 super-giant fields, called "elephants" in the oil biz, which went into production decades ago. Almost all of them have passed their peak. Seven to eight percent of the world's oil comes from the three biggest fields -- Saudi Arabia's Ghawar, Mexico's Cantarell and Kuwait's Burgan -- all of which now have apparently entered rapid decline. Cantarell's output has collapsed by 20 percent in just the past year alone. Compared with these fields, the newer oil discoveries added to reserves look like "mice." Mark Plus _________________________________________________________________ Download Messenger. Join the i'm Initiative. Help make a difference today. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_APR07 Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29418