X-Message-Number: 29453
From: "John de Rivaz" <>
References: <>
Subject: Re: autopsy
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:39:35 +0100

... only if they were willing to trust the unproven hypothesis that people 
automatically go to heaven as a part of natural events as opposed to the 
unproven hypothesis that cryopreserved people can be reanimated into 
youthful good health by future technology.

As both hypotheses cannot be proved either way, I would oppose compulsory 
cryopreservation as much as compulsory dissection.

-- 
Sincerely, John de Rivaz:  http://John.deRivaz.com for websites including
Cryonics Europe, Longevity Report, The Venturists, Porthtowan, Alec Harley
Reeves - inventor, Arthur Bowker - potter, de Rivaz genealogy,  Nomad .. and
more

> From: David Stodolsky <>
> Subject: Re: autopsy

> On 17 Apr 2007, at 21:49, John de Rivaz wrote:
>
>>  the
>> impossibility of science disproving beliefs with absolute certainty
>
> This would support those who feel going to Heaven makes cryonics
> unnecessary.

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29453