X-Message-Number: 29613 References: <> From: David Stodolsky <> Subject: Re: Article to be published in Free Inquiry Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:27:51 +0200 On 26 Jun 2007, at 13:47, Kennita Watson wrote: > >> Message #29599 >> From: David Stodolsky <> >> >> On 24 Jun 2007, at 16:02, wrote: >> >>> This may be enough for >>> preservation of the human mind, >> >> "mind" should not be treated as a noun. "Brain" would be better here. > > Pardon, but "mind" is a perfectly acceptable noun. I didn't say it was not a noun. I said it should not be treated as a noun. The 'mind' is a reference to an activity. See the paper "Mind is minding." dss David Stodolsky Skype: davidstodolsky Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29613