X-Message-Number: 29613
References: <>
From: David Stodolsky <>
Subject: Re: Article to be published in Free Inquiry
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:27:51 +0200

On 26 Jun 2007, at 13:47, Kennita Watson wrote:

>
>> Message #29599
>> From: David Stodolsky <>
>>
>> On 24 Jun 2007, at 16:02,  wrote:
>>
>>> This may be enough  for
>>> preservation of the human mind,
>>
>> "mind" should not be treated as a noun. "Brain" would be better here.
>
> Pardon, but "mind" is a perfectly acceptable noun.

I didn't say it was not a noun. I said it should not be treated as a  
noun. The 'mind' is a reference to an activity. See the paper "Mind  
is minding."


dss

David Stodolsky    Skype: davidstodolsky

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29613