X-Message-Number: 29785 From: Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:31:33 EDT Subject: Small apology to cryonet, some details on life insurance In a message dated 8/26/2007 5:02:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, writes: This is Rudi Hoffman writing from Florida. I want to provide a small, but semi-sincere apology if my posting to David Stodolski yesterday was innappropriate. This does not mean I back down from my observations. But, it is probably not generally a good idea to use colloquial language. Even if it sometimes may seem like this is the most pithy and succinct way of describing a given situation or individual's actions. Flavanoid asked in his posting if and when I recommend term insurance. The answer, Flav, is that I almost invariably provide a spreadsheet of coverage choices, in at least three amounts, and each of these amounts in three coverage types. These include a twenty year and thirty year level term, as well as the most evolved, consumer oriented, well backed, and guaranteed universal life options. And, yes, actually, Flav, about 57% of younger, healthy clients choose to start with a term policy. The carrier I generally use, BTW, is invariably in the top five of the most innexpensive and cost effective rates as measured by internet spreadsheet capabilities, and websites like insure.com and quotesmith.com. However, it is important to note that the carrier is also one of literally less than five companies in the world who have put IN WRITING that they have NO problem with cryonics organizations as OWNERS and beneficiaries. The term rates are not only competitive with quotesmith, but have locked in renewal rates, an "accelerated benefit rider" allowing access to up to 75% of the face amount while alive, and UPGRADABILITY built in. Most folks know term rates increase upon renewal, but don't understand exactly the EXTENT of the premium increase. I have on my desk as I write this a policy I will be delivering this week to a good client. We internet spreadsheeted the initial application to get the best realistic rate for this nice guy, and wound up with "Genworth" as the lowest cost vendor. His rate will be 977 a year for ten years. Then, his rate goes to $14,578 a year for the next year! And 15,789 the year after, and continuing to increase. I got in the insurance business 28 years ago to show people exactly the concept you referred to, Flav, called "Buy term and invest the difference." I was and remain securities licensed, and have the equivalent of two PhDs in financial planning, securities risk and return, and retirement planning, and actuarial science. So I think I get the question, and share your concern about the low return on traditional whole life policies. I replaced old fashioned "whole life" policies with this concept, and understand it, and the real world application of it, I suspect, a bit better even than you do. I have been securities licensed as well as insurance licensed for 28 years, and agree that old fashioned "whole life" policies are indeed bad deals for the consumer, and I do not sell them. Instead, modern "universal life" policies are actually a "buy term and invest the difference" concept in a single contract, with a decent and market based return on the cash accumulation, and lower cost internal cost of insurance (coi) than is available to individuals. So, "Flavanoid" why I have never quite understood the seeming antipathy that comes across in your posts about business, life insurance sales, making money, or for some strange reason apparently me personally, I think I have responded to some of your more pertinent questions adequately. As an interesting point of information which you may find satisfying, I have been working harder and longer this year and making about half the income I have in years past, BECAUSE I have focused on the very labor intensive field of cryonics life insurance. Unfortunately, and as a bit of personal self-disclosure, I am working harder and having less fun at it than at any time I can remember in my career. The general slowness of the economy, people's lack of discretionary income, and continually and increasingly challenging underwriting have made this year a bit of a hard "slog". And, because there are those who may be curious, even envious, of the fact that I have above 80% of the world market share in cryonics, please know that we are just barely making a living, and a heck of a way from getting rich. Save your envy for folks more successful than myself in 2007. This post may look badly labled, because it hasn't contained much of an apology, and none of this apology directed to Stodolski, who I still maintain is unreasonably argumentative, arrogant, and condescending in much of his postings. But I probably shouldn't have called him an a**hole. The level of vitriol and mean-spiritedness on the part of a few of our cryonics posters is surprising to me. And I want to part of the solution, not the problem. I remain ideologically committed to the ideals and potential of cryonics. These would include the sanctity and worth of individual human lives, the possibility that technology and education and genuinely TRYING very hard can make us better humans, and the secular values of creating the best world we can on this earth instead of an unlikely afterlife scenario. And, having just completed a wonderful bike ride in a beautiful world, I reiterate my suggestion, "Let's be happy while we're here." Respectfully, (and somewhat nicer than yesterday) submitted, Rudi Rudi Richard Hoffman CFP CLU ChFC Board Member Financial Planning Association fpafla.org Board Member Salvation Army salvationarmy.org Member Alcor Life Extension Foundation alcor.org Certified Financial Planner(TM) CFP Board of Standards Member Libertarian Party libertarianparty.org Member National Rifle Association nra.org Member World Transhumanist Association http://transhumanism.org/ World's Leading Cryonics Insurance Provider rudihoffman.com ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29785