X-Message-Number: 29810 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:05:27 -0700 From: "Jeff Davis" <> Subject: Re: microbe longevity in permafrost Someone wrote: >>> Analyses of five ice samples, spanning the last 8 million years in this region, demonstrated an exponential decline in the average community DNA size with a half-life of approximately 1.1 million years, <<< Whereupon John de Rivaz responds: > I would have thought that this "limit" could be regarded as indefinite as far as cryonics is concerned. Yes John, exactly right. The LN2 suspension temperatures are substantially lower than the permafrost. Then the rate of reaction (ie chemical degradation), dependent on the temp and defined by the Arhennius equation, is vastly slower. Indeed that degradation should take billions -- no typo that "b" -- of years. Effectively, as you say, indefinite. > If someone remains cryopreserved for any appreciable fraction of a million years this tends to suggest that reanimation is becoming increasingly unlikely as time moves on. But that suggestion would be ill informed. First, the increase in "unlikelihood" is vanishingly small -- what's a hundred thousand years, or even a million, compared to a billion. Second, and of vastly greater importance, the non-linear (exponential?) rate of technolgical progress so outpaces the rate of degradation as to reduce the latter to irrelevance. Within hundreds -- at the very most thousands -- of years, the technology for physical restoration or uploading will have been achieved or, alternatively, proven infeasible. Call me biased but my money is on "achieved". The evolved nanotech of biology proves it can be done. Which leaves us waiting on the steady "grunt" work of MNT development. I'll be waiting. In the cooler. In the oblivion of unconsciousness. Patient. And confident. -- Best, Jeff Davis "Everything's hard till you know how to do it." Ray Charles Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=29810