X-Message-Number: 30101
From: 
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:09:13 EST
Subject: Portfolio Article, a Conde' Nast Publication

In a message dated 12/5/2007 5:01:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
 writes:

Message  #30099
From: Mark Plus <>
Subject:  =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cryonics_in_Cond=E9_Nast_Portfolio?=
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007  16:20:12 -0800

December 2007 issue, on the stands  now:

http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2007/11/19/Longevity-Industry?pri
nt=true
_________________________________________________________________



Wow... I thought this was an excellent article...thanks for sharing  the 
pointer, Mark Plus.
 
Most of the players we know are here, portrayed in an uneven light,  with the 
kind of skepticism one expects of this type publication.  
 
I was honked they didn't point out that cryonics is generally  funded with 
life insurance, once again portraying cryonics as the exclusive  baileywick of 
the rich hedge fund managers of the world.  Dammit, please,  when you get your 
"fifteen minutes of fame" about cryonics, folks, please get  this important 
sound bite in, and make sure the reporter keeps it  in.
 
Aubrey gets a large part of the article, and in my opinion once  again is the 
visionary voice of reason, correctly pointing out the obvious that  ageing is 
a disease, just one that we all share.  Why is this such a hard  leap for 
even enormously gifted, educated, and highly educated  people?
 
The odds of us dying of an age related disease are probably higher  than 80%, 
the odds of us dying in a terrorist attack are so miniscule as to be a  

fraction of 1%.  Yet the US persists in a trillion dollar debacle called a  "war
on 
terrorism" while underfunding and overregulating antiaging  research.  This 
huge disconnect does not seem to be bothering anyone but a  few of us "kooks" 
involved in antiaging.  
 
It bothers the hell out of me...and ought to bother the hell out of  you.  On 
a personal note, I FEEL the ageing process happening, at 50, this  is no 
longer a theoretical or abstract issue...this is more of a desperately and  
embarrasingly personal war on entropy.  Like many of us who care about  these 
issues, I had kind of hoped these changes would be attenuated by diet and  

supplements and attitude.  I can no longer be sanguine about the results of  
antiaging 
research filtering down in time.

All in all, as good as popular  press tends to get about cryonics and 

longevity research.  Hope the article  gets a wide audience, and generates 
continued 
obsession with scientific control  of ageing and overcoming the tragedy of 
death.
 
How did the rest of you feel about this article?  Of course,  in the larger 
context is always surprising how little even great press seems to  matter re: 
cryonics signups.  The National Geographic team did a nuanced,  fair, and 
mostly positive hour long special on Cryonics, since shown multiple  times, I 

believe, on the Learning Channel...and the cryonics signups showed  barely a 
tiny 
bump...  Sigh...

Warm Regards,
 
Rudi
 
Rudi Richard Hoffman CFP CLU ChFC

I am proud to support Ron  Paul for President--Google Ron Paul

Board Member Financial Planning  Association fpafla.com
Board Member Salvation Army  salvationarmy.org
Member Alcor Life Extension Foundation  alcor.org
Certified Financial Planner(TM) CFP Board of Standards 
Member  Libertarian Party libertarianparty.org
Member National Rifle Association  nra.org
Member World Transhumanist Association  http://transhumanism.org/
World's Leading Cryonics Insurance Provider  rudihoffman.com



**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest 
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)


 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=30101