X-Message-Number: 30243 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:34:09 -0800 (PST) From: david pizer <> Subject: Alcor may already be in its final decline For years Alcor was the leader in cryonics. But now it may be in its final decline. Like Rome, Alcor may not even realize it is on the way out until it is too late. It pains me to have to keep bringing this subject up. I have dedicated a large part of my life to Alcor. They are in their present building and have a few million dollars worth of equity almost soley because of me. They got to Scottsdale, the mayor invited Alcor's president to his office and gave him the key to the city, when the mayor of Riverside was trying to get Alcor put out of business. They got to Scottsdale mainly because of me. I love Alcor. But I feel compelled to bring this serious problem to the Alcor membership because I think that unless it is fixed it will eventually cause the death of Alcor. WHAT ARE THE SYMPTOMS After the decline of ACS and TransTime the two remaining cryonics companies were Alcor and CI. Many cryoncists considered Alcor the leader in technology and CI having the most affordable prices. Although CI members did not concede having inferior technology. I believe that Alcor had many more funded members and more patients. That may have finally changed. But even if an Alcor member once felt that Alcor had an edge on technology that feeling among cryonicists is changing now that CI has access to Suspended Animation's technology. If fact one can argue that CI now has several advantages over Alcor. Here is what they might be. CI has two suspension options: A more affordable one that is much cheaper then even Alcor's neuro; and one that is similar to Alcor with the help of SA. Alcor only has the more costly options. They do have the neuro but it is a public relations nightmare. It helped turn what could have been the Ted Williams success story into the Ted Williams disaster. But even more important, CI has a more member friendly way of electing it's business managers. CI trusts its members to be smart enough to vote for their directors and officers. It holds its directors accountable for their actions by causing them to stand for re-election. They have a reputation for making far less business mistakes then Alcor because of this. Alcor has an elite system that says the Alcor suspension members are too stupid to be allowed to vote for directors. (I know that sounds rude but that is the truth. The directors just don't think the members are as smart as they are, and certainly not smart enough to be trusted to vote for directors) So, Alcor has a true dictatorship. The 9 dictators re-elect themselves every year and are accountable to no one but themselves. They don't have to account to the stockholders, members, patients, and they don't have to make a profit. They can even loose hundreds of thousands of dollars, as their president did with the Cells for Life disaster, or have it embezzled by employees as has happened, or many of the other mistakes we know about and lots of others that I believe have been hidden in secret meetings from the membership and after the smoke clears they simply re-elect themselves and waddle on. Both of these deficiencies in Alcor (less suspension options and dictatorship-style management) are beginning to take their toll. Membership growth is slowing down. Finance problems are a constant topic at board meetings who knows what goes on in the secret parts of the meetings. Some of the best and wisest old Alcor members are either quitting cryonics, or joining CI, or at least thinking about options like that. How many ex-Alcor presidents are no longer Alcor members? The red headed guy - I forgot his name he was the second or third president I believe, both Chamberlains, Mike Darwin - the man who made Alcor in the beginning, they are all gone. Is ex-President Waynick still a member? Most important: Gone is the optimism and enthusiasm that once was Alcor's. New people do come into Alcor, but after a few years they realize that they will never have much influence unless they agree to parrot the existing board members views. Most of the new members, the younger crowd, have too much in the way or moral principles to do this, so some of them quit. For every 2 or 3 people that go through the complicated process of becoming an Alcor member one quits. This tells us that people like the idea that Alcor stands for they just don't like the way Alcor is run. They join, they learn how things are managed at Alcor, they leave. As the wise old members and the enthusiastic young members begin to leave Alcor and perhaps join CI, they take their ideas,their time and energy, their money, and they contribute it to CI. CI Continues to gain on Alcor. How long until they pass Alcor? Have they already passed Alcor in amount of patients? How much after that until Alcor with it's bulging overhead and dwindling incomes begins to crumble? Good old members, people like myself, who have done many fine things for Alcor, go to the board and they tell the board that the board needs to give the vote to its membership. The board members, fearing they cannot win re-election by the membership because of their past record or managing Alcor, will never give the membership the vote, as they want to keep control of Alcor (because they are, after all, control freaks - I am sorry but that is what they are parinoid control freaks who do not trust anyone but themselves to vote for board members - I am trying to write this nicely but let's also be honest). CONCLUSION Can anyone think of a way to get some sense into the heads of the existing Alcor board members and get them to realize one of the oldest principle in the business world: People that are accountable, with all other things equal, will make less mistakes and do a better job then those in similar positions that are not accountable. At present, Alcor directors are not accountable to anyone. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=30243