X-Message-Number: 3037
From:  (David Stodolsky)
Subject: CRYONICS Re: Libertarian Mindsets
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 11:29:23 +0200 (MET DST)

In Message: #3022 - Re: Libertarian Mindsets,  writes:
> Our common desire for more freedom (or even complete freedom) 
> in choosing health care alternatives is, in my view, one of the more 
> relevant issues to discuss with both long time cryonicists and new 
> prospects.  Further, one could make a strong case that the legal 
> (i.e., governmental) requirement for pronouncement of death prior 
> to initiating cryonics procedures causes more damage to our 
> patients than anything else.  I for one do not think that the 
> fundamental problem is just that the laws need to be amended.

Since recent changes in the law in The Netherlands make it possible
for a doctor to assist a patient to die without fear of prosecution, 
changes in the law do seem to be one way to solve the problem. However,
the political framework in which this compromise was possible was
one dominated by social welfare thinking (Social Democrats are the
leading party in the current government). Some would argue that The
Netherlands is the leading social welfare state in the world. It certainly
is among the leaders.

So, if we look at the evidence, it does not support the idea that
Libertarian thinking is essential for achieving a favorable climate
for cryonics. Certainly, it is not the only philosophy capable of
producing a favorable climate.

So, Libertarian materials sent to this list run the risk of alienating
people and damaging the development of cryonics. 


David S. Stodolsky, PhD      Internet: 
Peder Lykkes Vej 8, 4. tv.               Internet: 
DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark           Voice + Fax: + 45 32 97 66 74

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=3037