X-Message-Number: 30417
From: David Stodolsky <>
Subject: Re: WHICH PLAN IS BEST?
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:03:27 +0100
References: <>

On 4 Feb 2008, at 22:44, david pizer wrote:

> David Stodolsky said:
>
> "Several plans have been put forward. However, the
> Board apparently  feels that the current system is
> fine. Under these circumstances, one  strategy would
> be to select the plan that has the  least effect upon
> the current governance structure, while providing  the
> best education  for the Board as to the advantages of
> further  change."
>
> Here is how we can all do that:
> Go to the main Forums page at
> http://www.reformalcor.org/forums/
>
> Look at the article entitled " How Much Accountability
> Do You Want At Alcor?"
>
> There are three degrees available to try to do what
> Dr. Stodolsky discusses above. EVERYONE is welcome to
> put in their comments on the subject.


The current problem is getting the Board involved at all. Some Board  
members may have no interest in a forum where everyone can be involved.

Even a CryoNet reader has indicated no interest in going to another  
forum for discussion. New forums tend to fragment the group of  
potentially interested persons. I can see no good reason to go to any  
other forum, even though I have been a critic of the CryoNet rules.

A Board typically acts on matters brought before it, if at all. The  
people interested in changes should put together a proposal likely to  
be accepted and then formally submit it. There is no certainty that  
there is any other way to get the info to everyone on the Board.


dss



David Stodolsky    Skype: davidstodolsky

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=30417