X-Message-Number: 30572 References: <> From: Kennita Watson <> Subject: Fwd: Voluntary learning Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 03:05:07 -0800 This was on Slashdot recently (2/28): > Correcting Misperceptions About Evolution > from the lost-cause dept. > posted by samzenpus on Thursday February 28, @01:13 (Education) > http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/28/0424240 It was all interesting, but became germane to cryonics at the end of page 3 (excerpted here). Interesting that the evolutionists have some of the same sorts of trouble as the cryonicists vis a vis educating the public (though not to the same degree). <excerpt> The state of the art meets the public With the state of the art established, the final speaker, Martin Storksdieck of the Institute for Learning Innovation looked at how to get that information to a public has such a hard time accepting what science is discovering. He argued that, while most of the attention has focused on childhood education, we really should be going after the parents. Everyone is a lifelong learner, Storksdieck said, but once people leave school, that learning becomes a voluntary matter that's largely driven by individual taste. Storksdieck discussed a number of key aspects of this voluntary learning. He argued that a surprising amount of it is faith-based; adults don't have the time or need to learn large frameworks like evolution, so they're often willing to accept or reject information based [on] reasons beyond its consistency with scientific understanding. As an example, he noted his own understanding of chemistry was weak, so he'd simply have to accept what Andy Ellington told him about the RNA world. The result is that what's accepted or not becomes largely a matter of social influences. Here, Storksdieck offered two specific suggestions. The first is to get people in positions of leadership involved, as people pay attention to them, regardless of their grip on the facts. His example was Thabo Mbeki of South Africa, who set the country's battle against AIDS back significantly simply by expressing doubt in our scientific and medical understanding of the conditions. His other suggestion was that we should, as he put it, keep preaching to the choir. Enthused learners are the best communicators of information, and arming them with more of what we know is the best way to get that information before the public. The series of talks was possibly the best overview of the state of knowledge in any field that I have ever seen, and the enthusiasm of the researchers and their excitement about the topics was palpable. I expect that, if the public saw more presentations like this, which revealed not only the full depth of our understanding, but also the enthusiasm, humor, and humanity of the people that have generated that understanding, then the teaching of evolution would generate only a small fraction of the resistance that it currently does. </excerpt> Hm. Maybe Alcor/CI should present to some councils of priests (there's probably a word for those). Ease into it; start with Unitarians :-) . Cheers, Kennita -- Relativity: A grook with no reference whatever to the two-party system To wear a shirt that's relatively clean, You needn't ever launder off the dirt If you possess two shirts to choose between and always change into the cleaner shirt. -- Piet Hein Live long and prosper, Kennita Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=30572