X-Message-Number: 3079 Date: 08 Sep 94 00:30:51 EDT From: Mike Darwin <> Subject: CRYONICS phenotypes Derek Ryan gently and thoughtfully takes me to task for lumping all cryonicists into merely two categories. Of course, I don't really believe that everyone can be so neatly sorted into two such stacks; one of the Elect and the other of the Damned. If that was the impression my post gave, then please let this (and Derek's remarks) correct it. Having said this I will now weasel a little and note that setting up broad and/or extreme categories is not unreasonable and in fact is done all the time. For instance, many naive people believe (often with great fervor) that there are true Democrats and true Republicans. The reality is, of course, far more complicated. Certainly there are people on either end of the spectrum: solidly liberal or solidly conservative. But, if you look closely, you'll find a surprizing spectrum of feelings and behaviors in between the two extremes. Despite these gray areas, the labels still are useful and can save one from both embarrassment and/or broken bones. The same is true in cryonics. Clearly, there is a diversity of opinion and feeling, and clearly this feeling can fluctuate in individuals from time to time. But the fact that there *is* a continum should not deter us from creating classifications which are useful. For instance, what *exactly* is a Deomocrat, or a Republican? There are clearly differences in cryonics practice and philosophy between Ettinger and me -- in fact I think it fair to say that we represent opposite ends of the spectrum as far as cryonicists are concerned (if we wish to add noncryonicists into the equation then members of the Society for Cryobiology have that honor). I believe there is room for all types. And, as I was careful to point in my post, it is by no means clear that my position is right. Since the ultimate proof must await succcessful revival of patients prepared with both philosophies in mind and in hand, we will just have to wait. In the meantime we get to argue our various positions. And, leaving aside whether this is terribly useful or not, it must be a great deal of fun, or we wouldn't do it. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=3079