X-Message-Number: 30796
From: David Stodolsky <>
Subject: Re: Advertising Cryonics
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:33:48 +0200
References: <>

--Apple-Mail-5--66489500
	format=flowed;
	delsp=yes


On 1 Jun 2008, at 02:40, hrhirsch wrote:
>
>
> I think we should aim for a short statement, the shorter the better,
> that says why cryonics has lifesaving potential and should be
> regarded as a valid experimental procedure.

While the Society for Cryo-biology denounces cryonics as a fraud, not  
much hope for this argument.


> Aside from the expense,
> the main difficulty with this approach will be persuading mainstream
> journals like JAMA and the New England Journal of Medicine to accept
> the ad. Still, it seems worth trying.


Assuming doctors would take this seriously, it would have no effect.  
The Badger data showed that advice from a Dr. would not significantly  
change peoples' attitudes toward cryonics.


dss

David Stodolsky    Skype: davidstodolsky




--Apple-Mail-5--66489500

 Content-Type: text/html;

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=30796