X-Message-Number: 31053
From: "FlavO Noid" <>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:51:43 -0500
Subject: To David Stodolsky re: Disease & Cryonics

--_----------=_122135710347130
Content-Disposition: inline

Your post on this subject, in particular psychiatric disease, makes
little sense as to the conclusions you appear to draw.  Therefore I would
ask you to define "social component" and "cryonics 'package'".  Please
explain why you appear to think that psychiatric disease is so special
that it should be somehow be addressed in current cryonics practice,
while other diseases are not.  And if I am not misunderstanding you and
you do think that, please explain exactly what you think cryonics
providers should now be doing relative to psychiatric disease.  (I could
nominate a few individuals for the program :-) )

The prevalent thought seems to be that fixing problems of various
diseases is relevant to the reanimation phase of cryonics, not the phase
we are in today.

-- 
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com


--_----------=_122135710347130
Content-Disposition: inline

 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31053