X-Message-Number: 31065
From: 
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:32:20 EDT
Subject: An even shorter note to Flav, off topic warning.

Hello, 
 
LOL!  I am glad you are a fan, Flav.  :)

Would you like to divulge your personal cryonics funding  arrangements either 
here publicly on cryonet-- or if you prefer individually and  privately to 

me-- to see if they are genuinely more cost effective, both now and  over time,
than the hundreds of carriers I have access to?   Do you  really want to get 
in a public shooting match with me?  On this  topic?  Because you know more 

about this, along with everything else you  know, than I do?  Or because you can
document that you have helped so many  hundreds of people make intelligent 
long term choices and secure their cryonics  funding?  In short, WTF is WRONG 
with you?  

I like scrutiny...we all need it to maintain high integrity and quality  

control.  Potshots by anonymous posters who may or may not have full  knowledge 
of 
all factors are less helpful...but these aren't particularlty  problematic.  
Flav's postings usually make me laugh.  And Flav, to his  credit, does 
occasionally have some helpful postings on cryonet.
 
Although why in the world he is so mean spirited to me I certainly do not  
know.  Maybe he doesn't understand or like sales and  business.   Flav, I am 
sorry if I ticked you off, or you have ever had a bad business or  sales 

experience in your life.  I don't have the time for a flame war with  you on 
cryonet.  
What if I apologize for trying to provide value for value  transactions and 
earn a living and we both move on?
 
Not that this is particularly on topic, but I will briefly  explain what may 
seem to be "disconnect" on my signature afffiliation  line.
 
I am currently and have been for years an atheist.  I used to  say 

atheist/agnostic/skeptic/bright/ethical secular humanist because the  "a" word 
has such 
unfortunate baggage.  
 
I remain on the board of the Salvation Army for at least two good  reasons.  
The first is that the SA does truly and genuinely good work to  help people in 
need.  They have an astounding infrastructure developed over  many decades to 
provide efficient and direct services to literally thousands of  people.  
Corny as this may sound, I think they are doing good work and I  feel I have 
contributed to this.
 
The second is to have a first hand insider's knowledge of what the  dangerous 
religious right is doing in our country.  I find the theology of  the SA 

retrograde, medieval, superstitious, mythological, and  ignorant.  But the good
they are doing far outweighs, in my opinion at  this time, the superstition 
mongering they do.  I acknowledge this could  change in the future, as the 
downside of faith is increasingly apparent to  me.
 
Gotta keep this brief.  Let's make today a good day.  Good luck  to you, 

Flav.  We would/will no doubt find much to like and admire in each  other 
when/if 
we meet in person.  You are a smart guy, and I wish you  well.
 
Peace.
 
Rudi
 
PS...If I was really wise I would probably hit "delete" instead of  "send."  
But I have a few minutes in this posting, and think someone may  get a smile 

out of it somewhere.  I guess I am not that wise if you are  reading this, as I
must have hit "send."  LOL!  

Rudi Richard Hoffman CFP CLU  ChFC

Board Member Financial Planning Association fpafla.com
Board  Member Salvation Army salvationarmy.org
Member Alcor Life Extension  Foundation alcor.org
Certified Financial Planner(TM) CFP Board of Standards  
Member Libertarian Party libertarianparty.org
Member National Rifle  Association nra.org
Member World Transhumanist Association  http://transhumanism.org/
World's Leading Cryonics Insurance Provider  rudihoffman.com



**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, 
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.      
(http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)


 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31065