X-Message-Number: 31146
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:29:27 -0700
From: "Finance Department" <>
Subject: Re: Re: "Julian Conrad" and the "regulation petition"

------=_Part_7100_162734.1226276967195
Content-Disposition: inline

I didn't say anything about "offtopic".  What I did was ask Conrad what his
point was in publishing the article.  He has yet to clearly reply to that
question.

The only potential trouble from the site Conrad led us to is if thousands of
people sign the petition, which I doubt will happen, but we are getting to
Conrad's motives here.  Were they to simply inform us about the site, as a
warning, or were they to try to get more signatures for the petition?  I'm
all for full disclosure and everyone knowing everything there is to know
about cryonics, including the negative stuff.  What is "curious" is that
Conrad gave no reason why he was providing the material, and ended it with a
link to the freeted site.  That's curious.

FD

The above is in reference to:

"Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 06:47:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Conrad <>
Subject: Re: "Julian Conrad" and the "regulation petition"

Mr. "Department" writes:

>And your point in publicizing this website, complete
with full text and a link to the "freeted" site, is
... ?

Links to cryonics-related web pages are now off-topic
on Cryonet?

Especially when they regard potential trouble (as in
"hostile regulation") for the practice of cryonics?

How curious.

Regards,

Julian"

------=_Part_7100_162734.1226276967195

 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31146