X-Message-Number: 31267
From: "FlavO Noid" <>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:56:10 -0500
Subject: For once, I agree with Rudi Hoffman

--_----------=_122939977070323
Content-Disposition: inline

And actually I don't mind him helping cryonicists get life insurance, but
that's another matter.

The Vatican and its various branches have retarded scientific progress,
exploited and made people suffer all over the world.  'Nuff said.

I wonder though if this is just an obsession of Rudi's, or no more than
another opportunity to get his advertising on CryoNet.  For example:

Rudi Richard Hoffman CFP CLU ChFC
Board Member Financial  Planning Association fpafla.com
Board Member Salvation Army  salvationarmy.org
Member Alcor Life Extension Foundation  alcor.org
Certified Financial Planner(TM) CFP Board of Standards
Member  Libertarian Party libertarianparty.org
Member National Rifle Association  nra.org
Member World Transhumanist Association  http://transhumanism.org/
World's Leading Cryonics Insurance Provider  rudihoffman.com

When will Rudi learn that most of the above hobbies and controversial
special interests are of no interest to cryonicists in general, and that
his business might be improved by paring down his sig line?  Such as
omitting everything between the first line and the last one, and omitting
the words "World's Leading" which whether true or not, comes across in an
arrogant manner, and if said by someone other than him, in an annoying
marketing manner.

His Buddy,

Flav

P.S.  There just might also be some Catholics on CryoNet that Rudi just
seriously offended and will never get his business.  Heck, if he has any
among his policyholders, they might even quit.  Is he up to the martyrdom
challenge, or does he live in the real world?

-- 
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com


--_----------=_122939977070323
Content-Disposition: inline

 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31267