X-Message-Number: 31425 From: Mark Plus <> Subject: Re: A Robert Ettinger quote for our times. Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:58:30 -0800 In Cryonet #31412, Mr. Stodolsky writes: >We know that a key variable in the acceptance of cryonics is religiosity. But "religion" acts as a catch-all term for a lot of disparate beliefs in different cultures. Many religions lack beliefs considered essential in the Abrahamic traditions, including an eternal afterlife or even eternal gods. Some scholars argue that "religion" at its most basic level starts with only one idea: The (mistaken) attribution of agency to nonhuman phenomena. That in itself doesn't imply any reason to oppose radical life extension through technological means. Jews seem over-represented in cryonics, for example, and I think someone from an Orthodox Jewish background sits on CI's board of directors. The libertarian bioethics writer Ronald Bailey has also noted that Jewish theologians and bioethicists have spoken and written much more positively about radical life extension than the conservative Christian ones (especially Catholics) at the conferences he's attended. Could modern Judaism's lack of emphasis on the afterlife, despite many Jews' "religiosity," make Jews more accepting of the idea of living extra-long lives through technological means? In Cryonet #31423, Mr. Stodolsky writes, in reponse to Mr. Ettinger: >>For the umpteenth time, it is CLEAR that money is a very minor factor in the slow growth of cryonics. >Tell that to the billion people who's income is less than a dollar a day. I know this will sound snarky, but for the past generation environmentalists have propagandized affluent Westerners to "live lightly upon the earth." Shouldn't we celebrate and admire these extremely frugal billion individuals for doing just that? Mark Plus _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live : Life without walls. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_allup_1a_explore_032009 Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31425