X-Message-Number: 31435 From: David Stodolsky <> Subject: Re: A Robert Ettinger quote for our times. Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:11:49 +0100 References: <> --Apple-Mail-16-192272179 format=flowed; delsp=yes On 4 Mar 2009, at 11:00, 2Arcturus wrote: > Religion in a broader anthropological, and humanist, context > includes one's overarching world view, one's highest values in life, > one's way of understanding the world, and one's way of life in the > context of one's perceived sense of purpose. "(Cultural) worldview" would be a better definition of this broader context.: <http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=world+view&sub=Search+WordNet&o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&h= > Weltanschauung, world view (a comprehensive view of the world and human life) http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=religion . a strong belief in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny; "he lost his faith but not his morality" . an institution to express belief in a divine power; "he was raised in the Baptist religion"; "a member of his own faith contradicted him" > 'atheists' usually practice a religion in the broader sense Most atheists would object that they don't 'practice' anything. A common quote is, "If atheism is a religion, then not stamp collecting is a hobby." A safer formulation would be that religions are a subset or component of worldviews. http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=atheism . the doctrine or belief that there is no God . a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods > Robert Ettinger has been right, I believe, in placing cryonics in > the context of what is generally called "transhumanism", with its > broader sense of the future and its possibilities, which is the > backstory and context in which cryonics make the most sense. From the marketing or organizational standpoint, this doesn't seem to have had much effect. dss David Stodolsky Skype: davidstodolsky --Apple-Mail-16-192272179 Content-Type: text/html; [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31435