X-Message-Number: 31491
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Phil Ossifur <>
Subject: re: Optimism

I agree with CPlatts view that optimism about financials is undue.
http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/dsp.cgi?msg=31487


That is why I follow Larouche. Larouche makes a pointed distinction between 
financials and physical economy-- and points to the failure to understand that 
distinction for the current problem. Only with an long term improvement in 
physical economy can we be sure cryonics is going to be around. 


The older I get, the more impressed I am with Larouche. I recommend CPlatt look 
at him more carefully. Without his Homeowner and Bank Protection Act, his call 
for a new Pecora commission and his version of the FDR Bretton Woods for fixed 
exchange rates, as well as maglev rails and nulcear power plants, none of us has
a future and cryonics will fail. My optimism in cryonics is based on my 
discovery of real history, real economics and the real future, in the year 2000 
when Larouche last ran for president.

http://www.larouchepub.com

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31491

Warning: This message was filtered from the daily CryoNet digest
because the poster's reputation was too low.
It thus may need to be rated.