X-Message-Number: 31516
From: "Kennita (Go Cryo!)" <>
Subject: Re: religion declining
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:35:56 -0700
References: <>

On Mar 18, 2009, at 2:00 AM, CryoNet wrote:

>>>>> The use of "religion" and "highest ideals" as equivalent doesn't
>> conform to common use, as has been pointed out earlier.
>>
>> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion.
>
> Wikipedia is known to be unreliable and biased.
>
This would be an argumentum ad hominem if Wikipedia
were a person.  It's a lot of people, so the name
almost applies, but there may be another one.

Compared to what?  I've found it to be quite helpful;
then again, I don't look for things like who's on the
right side of the Arab-Israeli conflict.  They also
seem to be good about labeling controversial topics
as such, and biases (which are hard to eliminate) are
identified.

If you find an entry to be wrong or biased, edit it
rather than denigrating it (or implying that it's in
a class worthy of denigration).  Or don't; whatever.

Live long and prosper,
Kennita

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31516