X-Message-Number: 31872
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:02:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: 
Subject: No Suspension by Plastination in Germany


Press article 
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,614006,00.html shows rumors
that Michael Jackson is getting plastination. However, this does not look like 
a cheap alternative to initial suspension for the client of a cryonics 
organization. The harvesting of tissue for plastinates works with the rights for
autopsy. Autopsy prior to a burial happens in hospitals as well as in anatomy 
institutes. Anatomy institutes provide places where University students take 
their dissection lessons. There are also a few anatomy institutes producing 
plastinates instead of using the corpses for autopsy during educational anatomy 
lessons and research.


Transfer of a corpse to an anatomy institute is allowed when the deceased person
made a last will about it. That testamentary disposition for a BODY DONATION is
different than an agreement for an ORGAN DONATION. Surgery lessons and 
scientific research on the corpse in an anatomy institute waive the duty for 
timely destruction of all human remains. But when lessons and research have been
accomplished, all the remaining tissues must be buried without notice. 
Manufacturers of plastinates don't have the right to waive the duty for a timely
destruction of human remains.


Plastinates aren't required for a burial, because the lawyers of plastinate 
manufacturers can claim that these aren't human remains but anatomical samples 
from ANONYMIZED DONORS which have been produced due to the destruction of 
aforementioned remains. Maximum production time which causes the destruction of 
human remains is only one day after receipt of a corpse. Then the manufacturer 
arranges the burial of any tissue which didn't made into production.


Anonymization prior to a BODY DONATION to an anatomy institute is required. 
There is no control over the donation of a body for plastination. So it is 
fairly impossible for people to make cheap arrangements where the legal 
advantages of anonymization by COMPLETE DESTRUCTION of human remains can be 
replaced by different means to make sure that the former living owner of the 
brain can be identified.


Press article http://www.kirchen.ch/pressespiegel/nzz/0199.htm in German 
language shows that costs for the creation of a plastinate can be easily 
forty-thousand US Dollars. Press article http://www.zitty.de/magazin/41967/ in 
German language shows that public relations by manufacturers require that 
plastinates should be purchased only by institutes who are publicly recognized 
for research and education. So it is likely that institutes who perform 
something like cryonics are not allowed to purchase a plastinate of their 
client's brain for later retrieval of personal characteristics ingrown in the 
brain's structure.


Above essay sent to  and 




Plantschen oder Grog? Der Arcor-Wetterdienst weiss Bescheid!
Wassertemperaturen fur den Urlaub jetzt checken:  www.arcor.de/rd/wetter_wasser

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31872