X-Message-Number: 32066
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:29:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: Melody%20Maxim <>
Subject: Re: CryoNet #32065
I don't know how Rudi Hoffman can call Larry Johnson "almost certainly
fraudulent," when Johnson has photos, documents and audiotapes to back up most
of his claims against Alcor. On the other hand, whoever called into ABC
Nightline and said Alcor's 1992 AIDS patient died in his bedroom, alone with his
partner, WAS being fraudulent, (unless Alcor was being fraudulent about the
makeshift operating room, in a garage, in their online case report). Then, there
was the time Alcor tried to pass off a ball peen hammer as a medical mallet.
Oh, and what about the NDA Alcor claims Johnson is in violation of? They have
never produced that document, most likely because it never existed, just like
the non-existent NDA I was accused of stealing, when I started criticizing
Suspended Animation. (I believe those false accusations originated with the same
person, someone who has been in positions of power, at both Alcor and Suspended
Animation.)
I know a lot of people want to think otherwise, at the moment, but I am still
"cryonics-friendly." I don't want cryonics to be banned, or over-regulated, but
I DO want some serious changes in the industry. It would be best if the
organizations would clean up their acts, on their own. Calling Johnson a liar,
in the face of all the evidence he has, is NOT a smart move, and it would be
refreshing to see the organizations respond with something other than the usual
denials, lies and personal attacks. Those things are going to get old in the
eyes of the public, the courts, and any regulatory agencies that might be
interested.
Vanguard Press claims to have fact-checked that book to the max, and it appears
they are willing to defend it against any, and all, attacks from Alcor. Alcor's
attorney, (who just happens to be LEF's (Kent and Faloon's) attorney, by the
way), didn't come off too well, on Wolf Blitzer, in my opinion, mostly invoking
"attorney-client privilege" and "patient confidentiality," and repeating what I
believe to be "half-truths," at best. I think it's going to be difficult for
Alcor to defend laymen performing surgical procedures, especially after people
read the case notes for the Williams case, which are far beyond "amateurish,"
but still manage to clearly describe the gross incompetency. Even worse, it's
going to be difficult to defend a former leader of Alcor, accused of euthanizing
patients, when Johnson has his former co-workers discussing those alleged
incidents, on audiotape.
Contrary to many of the myths that exist within the cryonics industry, there IS
enough money to hire professionals and professionals WILL work in cryonics, just
not under the conditions that exist. We don't want to be caught in situations
where people are cryopreserving patients who never signed up, pouring
biohazardous waste down city sewer systems, or using equipment that makes us
look stupid. We also don't want to be accused of hastening patients' deaths,
something that is still illegal, all around the world, (with the exceptions of
Oregon, Switzerland, Belgium and the Netherlands, I believe, and even in those
places, there are strict requirements, regarding the people allowed to
participate).
Vascular cannulations and perfusion, (the procedures needed to deliver the
solutions, in cryonics), are procedures that are well-established in heart
surgery, many decades ago, so there is no reason for cryonics care providers to
be botching them, so terribly, after all these years. Do the people reading
Cryonet realize open heart surgery and perfusion have not been around much
longer than cryonics? (Yet, look at the disparity in progress, between these two
fields!) Are cryonicists aware that some of the early pioneers of open heart
surgery were thought to be "kooks"? From "The History of Cardiothoracic Surgery
from Early Times:"
"Raymond Hurt takes the reader on a journey through history in a brisk, concise,
and comprehensive manner. The reader is awed by the bravery, courage, and
creativity of the pioneers in the field. These scholars were sometimes wrong and
sometimes so radical that they were ridiculed and threatened with bodily harm
but each concept slowly changed the way of thinking and advanced the
field."http://asianannals.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/6/2/131
("Slowly"??? Apparently the author was unfamiliar with the rate of progress, in
cryonics!)
I suggest people like Rudi Hoffman forget about PR for the folks who have
brought you nearly four decades of little-to-no progress, and demand reform.
Ultimately, it's Alcor's past activities, and continued failure to provide a
high standard of patient care providers, that have placed their organization at
risk, not Johnson's reporting of those activities. It's time for Alcor to break
ties with those strongly-associated with past foolishness, and chart a new
course...unless Alcor members want another 40 years of the same.
Melody Maxim
Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32066
Warning: This message was filtered from the daily CryoNet digest
because the poster's reputation was too low.
It thus may need to be rated.