X-Message-Number: 32254 From: David Stodolsky <> Subject: Re: social identity and well being Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:42:39 +0100 References: <> On 23 Dec 2009, at 11:00 AM, CryoNet wrote: > I have, without any justification > what-so-ever, thought that those of us with very strong and well > integrated > ego's might be able to hold our sense of self in these conditions > and get on > with the task of learning how to adapt to our new and novel > circumstances. > This might not be the case, as the article referenced by David, > http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121596786/abstract, would > seem to > suggest. If we are likely to not be able to find a sense of well- > being, and > perhaps not able to create the ego strength to undergo the rigors of > the new > tasks in front of us, we may not fully come to our selves. It may > be that > we are well advised to bring along as many memento's of past community > connections as we can via pics, sound files, video clips, etc. to > assist our > re-integration into the new communities in which we find ourselves. The main point of social identity theory is that individual identity is a result of a group processes, to a large extent. The idea of the unitary self has serious limitations. For example: In "Extending the Human Life Span: An Exploratory Study of Pro- and Anti-Longevity Attitudes" Kogan et al. (in review; 9) concluded: Benefits from life extension are believed to extend across the individual, interpersonal and societal levels. At the individual level, longevity is presumed to allow more time to achieve goals. At the interpersonal level, the long-term quality of relationships would presumably improve. At the societal level, greater wisdom and prestige accorded older people are presumed likely to ensue from enhanced longevity. The kinds of memory support mentioned could be helpful, but they don't address the real needs of maintaining the interpersonal self. For this, you need continuing social relationships. This is one reason that Badger (1998) found that alienation from family and friends was identified as an issue in choosing cryonics. In Ethical, social, and personal implications of extended human lifespan identified by members of the public (Rejuvenation Research; 12:351-7.) Partridge et al. (2009c; 356) concluded, "The most often- cited potential downsides included the possibility of . out-living family and friends, thereby reflecting the same themes of ... family as the most important benefits. These considerations are the basis for my conclusion that the cryonics movement should develop a marketing approach that facilitates the enrollment of groups of people, as a unit, in suspension programs. In the issue of Applied Psychology "Social Identity, Health and Well- Being" the main thrust is on how social relationships are crucial to health and longevity. Therefore, an approach of enrolling groups also has the effect of keeping people alive longer. If we compare countries with the best and worse social conditions, we find that there is three times greater life-span in the best countries. There are real longevity gains to be achieved through a social strategy for life- extension. dss PS: These are complex issues and just reading an abstract or a quotation doesn't give much of an understanding, unless you are already familiar with the field. David Stodolsky Skype: davidstodolsky Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32254