X-Message-Number: 32410
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:52:42 -0700
Subject: Removing incentive
From: Keith Henson <>

Some of the recent problem with suspensions may be coming from
relatives having a financial incentive to block suspensions.

If we think about it, most of us have a relative hostile to cryonics
who could be in a place to block a suspension depending on who died
first.

I think the section of the contract that specifies where the
suspension funding goes needs to be modified.  In fact I am going to
do this myself soon as I can get it worded correctly

Delete the section about who gets the funding if an Alcor member is
not suspended with this.
***********
In the event a suspension cannot be performed, (lost at sea, WTC
collapse, etc.) Alcor is still the beneficiary of the suspension
funding.  In such cases, Alcor may at its sole discretion pay part or
all of the suspension funding to a person or persons named here or to
the estate of the member.

(name of person, persons)

Alcor is forbidden to pay any part of the suspension funding to a
person or persons who have interfered with the member's prompt
suspension.

**********

Please comment.  I want to get this right the first time.

Keith Henson

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32410