X-Message-Number: 32707
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Lawrence <>
Subject: response to message 32702

--0-1319449098-1279035704=:1780


Although I haven't worked out any of the costs, wouldn't it be more appropriate 
to store the "remains" off planet.

Your system still requires energy and maintenance although at much lower levels.
And you also seem to assume that 100 years is a sufficient for reanimation, 
which, I think, is iffy.

Orbital storage would seem to bypass your two main concerns.  And, if you're 
concerned about dangers to the storage system from wars, financial 
instabilities, damage to the support system, etc., orbital storage would 
certainly minimize these concerns even more.

The only possible problem I can see, at least currently, is the danger involved 
is placing  the "cryosystem" into orbit.   That, and the cost.
Would you have an idea of whether the costs compare favorably to your system?
 




--0-1319449098-1279035704=:1780

 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32707