X-Message-Number: 32960 From: "John de Rivaz" <> Subject: nanotechnology Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:49:50 +0100 I have recently heard a radio programme about Feynman, and it said the he (not Drexler) is the true inventior of the subject - in 1959 with this paper: http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html so on this basis maybe 2060 is the target for assemblers to appear. But of course it will still be a long time between their appearance and their use in cellular surgery of the type required to cure cancer (really this is the only way, to suggest anything else for a complete cure is fraud) and aging and freezing damage. Maybe one should look at the time lag between the Nazi mechanical computer and Windows 98? [1938 to 1998 - 60 more years] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Zuse -- Sincerely, John de Rivaz: http://John.deRivaz.com for websites including Cryonics Europe, Longevity Report, The Venturists, Porthtowan, Alec Harley Reeves - inventor, Arthur Bowker - potter, de Rivaz genealogy, Nomad .. and more ----- Original Message ----- From: CryoNet To: Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:00 AM Subject: CryoNet #32951 - #32953 Message #32951 References: <> From: Gerald Monroe <> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:37:37 -0500 Subject: Re: CryoNet #32949 - #32950 --001636164a555469080492e51f47 Perry : what's the closest real world industry or field that is working on a precursor to molecular manufacturing? One thing about the overall field that keeps nagging at me : we have a good, solid description of what molecular manufacturing is and how it will we work. Many scientists are confident it will work (and I think the prior art of nature itself is proof enough). How many years typically passed between when writers and scientists of the past accurately described a technology and when it was first prototyped? For instance, Babbage's analytical engine was described in 1837 (refined until his death in 1871) and the first mechanical computer that was comparable was the German Z1, completed 1938. 101 years. Content-Type: text/html; [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32960