X-Message-Number: 33033 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:55:21 +0100 (CET) From: References: <> Subject: Re: #33029: Molecular Nanotech: implementation questions [Mik... Sure, scientists and experts in physics, chemistry, etc., already thought about a truly massive production out of molecular assembler design. They did the math. After this, leading managers will make important determinations with the general proposals deriving from research. Yet, economists couldn't tell in simple words, so I'm only guessing that managers in any greater financial institute including those in Arabia, China, and the Vatican are soon beginning to think about how to finance something. Managers will be decades ahead before average mass market consumers can be gaining the intelligence to think enough about this tiny manufacturing tool too. Some thinking from consumers like me is going to be artificially enhanced and corrected by a highly secure nanocomputer grid inside a submarine data center using natural water cooling and waste power retrieval due to new inventions like a voltage between hot and cold electrodes generated by electron waves traveling along chains of benzene rings. Perhaps a few decades later, the masses of commercial software consumers will be printing out home-made single-chip computers including Terabytes of RAM and hundreds of CPU cores for parallel processing. Banks need them first, just for the many trillions of financial payments any of them will transact with this powerful picotech precursor. When individual managers have gained their deserved earnings in highly profitable quantities while beginning to think about picotech, various end-consumer groups might already buy molecular assembler design while I'm not even needed to ask them for. This will just happen, also when I'm not with them anymore, don't you think so? > > Message #33029 > Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:19:09 -0700 > From: Mike Perry <> > Subject: Molecular Nanotech: implementation questions > References: <> /cut/ > basically, has anyone tried to seriously think about how you would, > in step-by-step fashion, go about getting from where we are now to > the scenarios of Drexler and/or Freitas? Has anyone attempted to > start down this path? If so, what obstacles did they encounter, etc.? > /cut/ /// Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33033