X-Message-Number: 33221 From: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:22:44 EST Subject: Darwin document format, and motivation Content-Language: en Thanks Charles for the formatting tips. As it is, I usually post & delete 2-3 times in the Cryonet Queue trying to get the formatting 'right.' As for the URL, the short URL did not work, and regardless of what URL you post, the Cryonet software garbles it up. Having said that, I was able to verify that the 'second URL,' apparently generated by Cryonet, worked for me. I'm sorry it didn't work for some others. The piece was also posted on The Immortality Institute Forum under the cryonics subheading, however, I think that it has subsequently been removed. When a durable URL is available, I will post that link here on Cryonet. Charles asks, quite reasonably: "Two years ago, when Cold Filter was far more problematic, I recall you opining that resistance was futile. You made a couple of long posts to Ms. Maxim, I think, and then disappeared. Now, apparently, you have changed your mind. Some explanation for this would be useful." I still think, as I did then, that direct resistance in the form of hand-to-hand combat on Cold Filter, or any other non-moderated, or actively hostile to cryonics forum, would be useless. I give the reasons for that in what I have written, but in a nutshell, it simply doesn't work because liars can and will generate endless streams of lies with little effort that will, if answered credibly by the victims of those lies, simply result in the exhaustion of those selfsame victims. It's a beautiful and time honored tactic which is highly effective. Thus, any defense must be a 'metalevel' defense - at least an order of magnitude more sophisticated than the attack. That kind of undertaking does not become possible until some reasonable (even if quite small) cross section of the cryonics community becomes aware of the actual cost, or the actual damage being done by these creeps. Even now, mostly what you will see is "let it run off you like water off a duck's back." Of course, that is easy for people who are only digital ghosts, to say. Let THEM wake up in the morning and find that if their current or potential employers Google them, they will find they are called 'fuck pipes,' sexual deviants, or are labeled as professionally, personally, technically and morally bankrupt. I did not write the Cryonics Manifesto simply out of some 'abstract' concern for cryonics, nor based upon extrapolations from Nazi Germany ;-). While both of these things are valid, they were not the precipitating event. Nor was there any concern for myself regarding these lies. Fact is, I have not read "Frozen,' never looked at Cold Filter unless Finance Director (FD) prompted me to (which was very rarely), and I found out about the Nightline program by sitting down and watching it - something I do almost every night I'm home (and here in the US). In fact, I've had an extraordinarily good last 4 years - better than most guys my age, and I have to confess I've given almost no thought to the goings-on that I just posted so passionately about. So, what was my reason? Simple, I recently learned that some of the most important people in cryonics were becoming so demoralized and beaten down by these broad-based attacks on cryonics that they were thinking of throwing in the towel. Perhaps this fact will put the attacks from Maxim, et al., in a different light, because it should now be apparent that without any recourse to governments or courts, these creeps were (and arguably still are) on the verge of depriving us of one of our most precious resources; our most competent and fair minded people. And that is only the harm we see. I know they are causing a great deal of additional harm because I am starting to get emails from friends and colleagues in the critical care community asking me, "What's going on?" and worse still, "Is any of this stuff true?" That means, inevitably, that good people are being put off of cryonics, and that our credibility and reputation are suffering. That will in turn translate into losses and damage in every area cryonics. That this is inevitable is not in doubt; Chatsworth had exactly this effect, and for the same reasons in the late 1970s and early 1980s - indeed into the mid-1980s. Cryonics is not a highly credible discipline with a lot of PR capital to burn - it could not be, given the global culture. Any bad things said about cryonics will attach to the already questionable and uneasy ideas and feelings that the majority of the population holds in their heads about us. And the truth is that the world should be uneasy about cryonics because the values we hold are, in fact, antithetical to much of the existing order of things. Abolishing death, or attempting to, is arguably the most subversive thing on the planet. We should be proud of that. Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33221