X-Message-Number: 33269 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:43:07 -0700 Subject: Pareto's cryonics filter From: MARK PLUS <> The Edge Question for 2011 asks: WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY'S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT? One of the essays offers the Pareto Principle as an answer: http://www.edge.org/q2011/q11_6.html#shirky "You see the pattern everywhere: the top 1% of the population control 35% of the wealth. On Twitter, the top 2% of users send 60% of the messages. In the health care system, the treatment for the most expensive fifth of patients create four-fifths of the overall cost. These figures are always reported as shocking, as if the normal order of things has been disrupted, as if the appearance of anything other than a completely linear distribution of money, or messages, or effort, is a surprise of the highest order. "It's not. Or rather, it shouldn't be. "The Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto undertook a study of market economies a century ago, and discovered that no matter what the country, the richest quintile of the population controlled most of the wealth. The effects of this Pareto Distribution go by many names - the 80/20 Rule, Zipfs Law, the Power Law distribution, Winner-Take-All - but the basic shape of the underlying distribution is always the same: the richest or busiest or most connected participants in a system will account for much much more wealth, or activity, or connectedness than average." In other words, the Pareto Principle suggests that 20 percent of the population could supply 80 percent of the candidates for growth in cryonics. Given our scarce resources, we should identify and target this 20 percent of the population, based on a characteristic which makes them more receptive than average to the cryonics idea, and ignore the rest. This principle suggests other areas to investigate in cryonics. Do 20 percent of suspensions generate 80 percent of the costs, for example? -- Mark Plus Life is short: Freeze hard! Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33269