X-Message-Number: 33280 From: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:07:30 EST Subject: Actuarial Tables Content-Language: en In a message dated 1/27/2011 2:02:45 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, writes: The most striking thing clearly is the steady reduction in mortality rate with advancing age. A man of 80 can only expect about 7.28 years more, but if he reaches 90 he still can expect another 3.84 years. Escape velocity, anyone? MD: Ah, I wish! What is actually going on here is interesting, but alas doesn't portend immortality, or a pathway to it. The folks who live to be centenarians and super-centenarians are extraordinary people who represent the extreme of a continuum of long-lived people. They have a number of things in common, including lower than average growth hormone levels, high HDLs, superior protection against cancer, and very likely, genes that protect against obesity and minimize free radical injury. There are undoubtedly other biological and environmental factors, but these are the things that currently stand out. Interestingly, it is possible to sort those who will not live past 100 from those who will with a fair degree of precision by looking at their medical histories and cognitive functioning. Super-centenarians, in particular, experience 'low inflammation aging' and virtually never suffer from degenerative disease until well into their 90s, or beyond. They similarly remain cognitively intact into their 90s, and in this respect, men do much better than women! That's encouraging and useful information for gerontologists. However, it is important to understand that even these super-agers are biologically doomed - for now. Perhaps one of the few redeeming benefits of the atmospheric testing of atomic weapons during the 1950s and '60s is that it resulted in a large pulse of atmospheric 14C, which subsequently found its way into developing fetuses undergoing gestation at this time. This peculiarity was first applied to carbon dating of lens crystallins proteins by comparing the 14C concentration of the lens crystallins to the "bomb pulse' of 14C release that occurred during the era of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. As it turns out, 14C concentrations fluctuated distinctively year by year with the number of open air tests, and this has allowed for precision dating of the crystallin proteins. The results of these studies have proved conclusively that almost all lens crystallins are elaborated during fetal development, with only miniscule (and steadily decreasing) additional synthesis over the course of life.(Lynnerup N, Kjeldsen H, Heegaard S, Jacobsen C, Heinemeier J (2008) Radiocarbon Dating of the Human Eye Lens Crystallines Reveal Proteins without Carbon Turnover throughout Life. PLoS ONE 3(1): e1529. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001529.) This really isn't surprising, and it confirms what many ophthalmologists and gerontologists had long suspected. However, this technique has also been applied to the nuclear DNA of brain neurons, with careful control for local (i.e., regional geographical) variations in 14C levels, as well as study good design to exclude any possible contribution to the 14C of neuronal DNA via methylation. The result of this study has demonstrated conclusively that there is essentially no neuronal cell division in the cerebral cortex of humans after the perinatal period. (Spalding KL, Bhardwaj RD, Buchholz BA, Druid H, Frisen J. (2005) Retrospective birth dating of cells in humans. Cell. 122:133-43.) In the case of both neurons and glial cells, what we are born with is all that we will have for the remainder of our lives._[1]_ (aoldb://mail/write/template.htm#_ftn1) While neuron components such as cell membranes, organelles, and vesicles undergo dynamic molecular turnover, neuronal and most glial cell DNA remain atomically unaltered throughout life! The atoms in your brain DNA you are born with, are the atoms you will die (or be cryopreserved with). This has interesting implications, because gray matter neuron loss is virtually linear with age, and continuous from age 2 throughout life. White matter losses are also linear, but begin later in life. This makes sense when considered in the context of the amount of DNA damage per cell per day which has been estimated at ~ 1 million molecular lesions daily! (Lodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, Zipursky SL, Darnell J. (2004). Molecular Biology of the Cell, p963. WH Freeman: New York, NY. 5th ed.) Super-centenarians also experience this relentless loss of gray and white matter, but at a much slower rate. This may be due to better protection against DNA damage, better DNA repair, or both. But, in any event, it seems that the brain (and a number of other vital structures and tissues), have no built-in replacement programs; and this is confirmed by the absence of evidence of DNA methlyation, as well (at least in us humans). So, barring the advent of fairly sophisticated brain rejuvenation technology, we will eventually end up as neurological Struldbrugs, since we are losing neurons with each passing day - and at an astonishing (and to me, very disconcerting) rate. Yet another reason why cryonics is likely to be essential for many of us who may not make it to such definitive rejuvenation technologies. Mike Darwin ____________________________________ _[1]_ (aoldb://mail/write/template.htm#_ftnref1) By contrast, the average age of non-epithelial intestinal cell nuclear DNA is ~15.9 years and skeletal muscle DNA was found to have an average age of 15.1 years. The mean age of cerebrocortical and cerebellar gray-matter DNA was only 2.9 years younger than the person. The gray matter of the occipital cortex demonstrated the most turnover with non-neuronal DNA being ~10 years younger than the person. Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33280