X-Message-Number: 33325 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:03:53 -0600 Subject: Thanks to Dr. More From: Finance Department <> --0016e6dee788be8e9c049c0ebd8c Thank you for replying to my post. That gives me some indication that you care what Alcor members and prospective members think, a trait conspicuously absent in most past Alcor Presidents and current members of its executive board. Permit me to answer some of the items in your post, as well as ask another question or two. You said (in brackets): [There's something a little odd about someone calling themselves "Finance Department" questioning whether my name is "real". I'm not sure what "real" is supposed to mean, but I'll assume you mean "legal name" and/or "name solely used".] It's pretty obvious, likely also to Chris Manning (another reply I got), that "Finance Department" is not my real name. It is a handle. Another place I've posted to for years, I got dubbed "FD" and anyone can call me that if they like. Why I use that particular handle and why I post anonymously, has been explained many times on that other forum (Cold Filter, where Luke I guess is one of the few "pure of mind and speech" regulars J/K). I will not go into that in this post, but may in another if it seems CN readers have generally not heard of me and my various critiques regarding Alcor. As to my having a right to use a handle and you not, I am not the President of Alcor, and have no public obligation to be personally scrutinized. Thank you for explaining that More is your real name; I assume changed such from O'Connor in a valid court of law? [My Alcor title is both president and CEO.] Thanks for acknowledging that you are Alcor's President, but your statement above does not concur with Alcor's bylaws, which do not provide for a CEO nor a Chief Executive Officer which you call yourself here: http://alcor.org/AboutAlcor/meetalcorstaff.html At best, either of those latter terms are descriptive of your real job, which is President, but neither of them is your job title. But it would be appropriate if you ensured the above-mentioned link describes you as "President and CEO". Perhaps that is already a job in the works. Alcor's bylaws do, though, also provide for an Executive Director. You can officially call that your title too, if the Board determines it. It has been a favorite of recent Presidents to, strangely it seems, try to obscure the fact that they were Presidents. But it never meant that they were not also Presidents. BTW, here is the applicable section of the bylaws: "ARTICLE 6. OFFICERS SECTION 1. NUMBER OF OFFICERS The officers of this corporation shall be a President, a Secretary and a Chief Financial Officer who shall be designated the Treasurer. The corporation may also have as determined by the Board of Directors a Chairman of the Board, an Executive Director, one or more Vice Presidents, Assistant Secretaries, Assistant Treasurers, or other officers. Any number of offices may be held by the same person except that neither the Secretary nor the Treasurer may serve as the President or Chairman of the Board." Having said the above, I must also say I am delighted to see Alcor's Board (unilaterally, sans member input or voting of them in) have appointed an academically-qualified person to Alcor's Presidency. For the one Alcor board member who sometimes writes to me, that was a sincere comment. :) And now for the other of the 2 questions. What is your view/vision of where Alcor must go and how, with 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year timetables? That would cover changes necessary as well as new agenda, and is real Presidential material. :) Best regards, FD --0016e6dee788be8e9c049c0ebd8c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 [ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33325