X-Message-Number: 33387
From:
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:59:33 EST
Subject: Melody Maxim's Distorted Reality 20
Mike: "Ben did not like the fact that this system was too big; it could
not fit in the tiny prep room of the cranky mortician CI uses. I told him
that an integrated cart could be fabricated to replace the mortician's prep
table that would include all of these things and more... The answer was still
'no': it was all too complicated..."
I received much the same answers..."Too big, too complicated." While I
would certainly have liked to have seen more of my perfusion suggestions
implemented, I understood that CI had their limitations. If you have to do your
perfusion at a mortuary, and the mortician will only allow you a certain
amount of space that is what you have to live with. It's not like there's a
funeral director willing to participate in cryonics on every street corner.
And, if you can't afford a full-time perfusionist, or standby perfusion
fees, you can't afford it.
Mike: So, Ben asked me to set CI up with what he saw as a very simple
circuit that basically consisted of the arterial leg of a standard CPB AV-loop.
I told him I would do this ONLY if he would accept the (free) training and
teaching that MUST accompany this. He refused. I explained that the very
simple (indeed crude) system CI used had one great advantage: it's simplicity
reduced the chance of catastrophic errors. I told him bluntly and
repeatedly that the instant large surface area devices are introduced into a
circuit enormous knowledge is PRESUMED about how they will behave and how to
de-bubble them. A simple glass bubble trap would be infinitely better for CI
than even a good auto-venting arterial filter - absent extensive and
VALIDATED training on how to use such equipment.
I cannot even begin to explain how strongly I disagree with this, as a
trained and experienced perfusionist "with a working knowledge of perfusion at
Board Certification level," and as someone who has watched the employees of
SA use both a bubble trap and an arterial filter. They had difficulty
priming the bubble trap, and filled it with air almost every time they turned
the pump off, and then didn't know how to remove the air, in order to resume
flow. They didn't have these problems, once I changed to an arterial
filter. The arterial filters are much easier to use. They come preassembled,
with a bypass loop and a purge line that includes a one-way valve. In
addition, not only do they protect against air, but they remove particulate
matter.
Mike: "Instead, he went out and hired a perfusionist to do what he wanted
done. I'm sure this person did the best they could under the circumstances.
But, what the expert forgot was that a perfusionist is not made in a day,
or a week, or a year, and that hundreds of lab hours and clinical hours are
clocked before they are turned loose - even as an intern on a human
patient. During those 'invisible' hours the perfusionist soaks up an
'instinctive' knowledge of the craft."
Mike seems to mistakenly assume I didn't make certain suggestions, (some
the same as his). In addition, Ben didn't hire me to "do what he wanted
done," he asked for my professional opinions and suggestions, and some basic
instruction, then he made decisions, based on CI's "comfort zone." It was
ridiculous, and extremely presumptuous, for Mike to assume I forgot "a
perfusionist is not made in a day, or a week, or a year, and that hundreds of
lab
hours and clinical hours are clocked before they are turned loose." I'm sure
I know that much better than he does. A perfusionist isn't made in a
couple of decades, by experimenting with perfusion equipment in cryonics, and
relatively little actual clinical experience, either. I'm quite sure Ben
would confirm that I must have said something akin to, "I can never teach you
what you need to know, about perfusion, in these three days," dozens of
times, while I was there.
Mike: "The result was that CI pumped air on the first patient on whom they
used their 'new and improved circuit' which was, more or less, exactly WHY
I told Ben I refused to do as he asked. CI returned to a
'simpler'circuit..."
CI pumping air was not the result of consulting with a perfusionist, or a
"new and improved circuit" which was minimally changed from what they had
before. I've been told it was the result of someone not being attentive to
the reservoir, and to the introduction of a large amount of bubbles while
pouring additional amounts of solution into the reservoir. I've also been
told massive amounts of air get pumped in a very large percentage of cryonics
cases, while this is an EXTREMELY RARE, (virtually unheard of, in this day
and age), occurrence in conventional medicine, where professional
perfusionists are used. Incidents like this are a result of amateurs performing
perfusion, NOT a result of consulting with professionals. Whether you have a
bubble trap or an arterial filter, when introducing large amounts of air into
the circuit, you will, at some point, exceed the amount of air the device
can handle. "LESSON ONE" for perfusionists is "Don't pump air," (in other
words, "ALWAYS WATCH THE RESERVOIR"). In my opinion, for cryonics, "LESSON
ONE," in regard to perfusion should be adapted to "KEEP THE RESERVOIR FULL.
(In conventional medicine, this can't be done, because it's important to
hemodilute the patient as little as possible, but this is not the case in
cryonics.) When using large volumes of solution, such as is the case in
cryonics, there are ways to introduce additional solution to the reservoir,
without introducing air. I discussed at least two methods, with Ben, so I won't
go into the technical details, here.
Sigh. Yes, I know all this. And I could foresee it and I did. But you have
yet to explain why this happened at CI only after they got a new circuit?
Why was the reservoir not baffled, or at a minimum why was this not done
(these are instructions written 30 years ago for emergency (expedient)
perfusion equipment):
4.0 Set-Up of the Circuit for Cryoprotective Perfusion:
4.1 The circuit consists of a minimum 5-liter reservoir with a bottom
outlet (10 liters is preferred). TURN THE PUMP OFF AND CLAMOP THE LINES TO THE
PATIENT WHEN FILLING OR REFILLING THE RESERVOIR! The reservoir should be
filled, if possible, using a funnel with a short length of tubing attached.
The end of the tubing can be positioned below the liquid surface when adding
additional perfusate. This will reduce the amount of air introduced into
the perfusate when additional volume is added. The tubing between the funnel
and reservoir is clamped when the funnel is first filled and air is purged
from as much of the line as possible. The clamp is then slowly released
allowing air to be displaced as filling is continued. One reason it is
desirable to have a larger reservoir is that it reduces the number of
interruptions required in order to top-up or change cryoprotectant
concentration.
The reservoir should be wrapped in some kind of insulating material if
possible; a small blanket or a number of turns of fabric will do.
You conclude:
I've taken more time with this than I wanted to, and now I'm pretty much
done with this discussion, other than to reiterate that I think it is
extremely unproductive for Mike Darwin to discourage the use of professionals,
all the while demanding a professional level of competence. Cryonics is going
no where fast, for so long as the community is encouraged to shun medical
professionals.
--Melody
Yet again, I have not done this; what I have done is to realize that
existing cryonics organizations will misuse professionals; seeking them out
selectively and using their input equally selectively and without acquiring the
needed knowledge base and skills to truly address the problems.
Professionals (mostly unsuspecting) who get suckered into this relationship are
the
ones who get hurt; the cryonics people just keep trucking on, indifferent to
the misery they have caused, the iatrogenesis they have created, or the
patients they have harmed. They get away with it because cryonicists believe
time will heal all wounds and overcome all stupidity - and mostly because
the patients cannot scream, or bleed, or otherwise show objective signs of
the injury they have suffered.
--Mike Darwin
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ]
Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33387
Warning: This message was filtered from the daily CryoNet digest
because the poster sent too many messages per digest.
It thus may need to be rated.