X-Message-Number: 33418 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:03:47 -0700 Subject: Re: more on uploading From: Keith Henson <> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:00 AM, wrote: > Mike Perry says that a simulation of a computation is a computation, and > not unimportant. I say it is unimportant in the same sense that a copy of a > map is unimportant--not really affecting the general rule that a > description of a thing is not that thing. > > As to quantum computation, there are many unanswered questions. > > As to the suggested universal character of symbolism, that also remains > speculation. Not that I'm against speculation, but it needs to be kept in > perspective. And never forget that the symbolism is CODED, requiring > interpretation. In general, a set of symbols does not have a unique interpretation. > I am not sure these objections make sense in practical terms. Back last Oct I wrote: "While I am sympathetic with Bob Ettinger case that uploading can't happen, what do we do with the case of downloading back into a human? "If uploading is possible at all, then the reverse process should be no harder. "Assume a person is uploaded, and their body and brain shut down. (Because of a "one version at a time" law.) Then some time from hours to years later, the state of their brain is updated with the current information from their uploaded version, their body warmed up and they go for a walk with the memories and skills they acquired in the uploaded state. "Are the memories they have of their time being an upload legitimate? Like Bob, I find Hans Moravec's destructive uploading distasteful. But for the clinic seed story, I had to give a lot of thought to the problem. It seems that nanomachines can be so much smaller than nerve cells that (eventually) we could infiltrate a brain with them and extract not only structure (connections) but learn the process of every nerve cell and synapse. An external swarm of computers could duplicate the process--which looks to me like an upload. Bob, would some of your objections go away if *every step* in the uploading could be reversed? Keith Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33418