X-Message-Number: 33456
From: 
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:02:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: CryoNet #33443 - #33452

After reviewing some of these debates, a word of request seems  reasonable.
I agree with my Asian ancestors to preface what I may debate by saying if  
it is useful keep it, and if not useful just ignore me and go on with no bad 
 feelings, please.
 
I have worked many years as a science teacher. When I was 14 years I  

organized a small group of teens with the support of a college sociologist and
called the group "Delta Group" for the goal of changing the world using  
resources in "Futurist" magazine of the World Futurist Society in the early  
1970's. It was immediately my experience as a young idealist that people do  
not generally respond to earnest debate speculating on the way to go to a 

better  future for the world with an easy and kind debate. It stirs up all the
worse suspicions talking about changing the world. Yet we do it everyday 

even by  accident, don't we? So all I ask is this, that most of the energy and
intelligence showing should be actually science analysis and not political 
or  psychological negative speculation.  None of the eventual discovery and  
result that works will be the product of one genius. This will be as much  
science biological industry as anything done before. 
One other thing I humbly ask of my colleagues in the Long Life movement:  
That we keep in mind that on the other side of the economics of this effort  
economics will look very different so let us not nickel and dime ourselves 
into  energy wasted wars. What is the credit rating of a person who will live 
for  another 800 years with all the skill sets and even vastly senior 

experience they  would have in that place of existence? Considering what we have
learned in 50  years since the cyberspace science blossomed, where will 
capabilities be in 800  years? 
I am all for professionalism and new efforts to reason out what kind of  
regulations we will benefit from in a new blossoming science industry that 
works  and is called cryonics, but we don't need to do it by Junta 

assassinations like  some banana republic in social change do we? On the other 
side of 
the economics  when we find improved research results to our science 

technology the  possibilities will be expansive and will make immediate sense to
most the  general public without much of a sales pitch needed. All we need to 
do is pay  attention to the actual work before us as a community.  I thank 
you for  your time with deepest respects to all sides seeking to answer to the 
truth. 
SWN
 

 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=33456