X-Message-Number: 3961 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 1995 21:22:01 -0800 From: John K Clark <> Subject: SCI.CRYONICS Uploading -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- (Thomas Donaldson) Wrote: >Even Moravec is someone whom I doubt would make such a machine >when push comes to shove. I doubt that, I doubt that very much. >it becomes clear that at some level you must leave off dealing >with symbols. It's what the symbols MEAN that is important Symbols symbolize things, and one of those things are events in the real world. When one symbol triggers another symbol there is an isomorphism to occurrences outside of the brain. >flatworms can show very primitive learning. When they learn to >turn left or right in a T-maze, are they manipulating symbols? Yes, but I don't think an animal much simpler than that could. I doubt that the hardware realization of a symbol can be all the way down to the single neuron level. A symbol must be able to interact with any other symbols back and forth, most ( but not all) of the information a neuron handles travels down a one dimensional axon, and in one direction. Even the simplest symbols probably require several neurons working together. >We can't find out the meaning of words from a dictionary alone That's true. All the definitions in a dictionary are made of words that are also defined in the dictionary with more words. We are saved from circularity because we learn the meaning of most words not from a definition but from a demonstration. We learn that a symbol in our head, in this case a word, corresponds to an event that happens outside ourselves. John K Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.i iQCzAgUBL1vmun03wfSpid95AQFiKATvf3zY9JhJgQiCIdPQUn8rW+wfA6AZIKms xFmWIDns0zEM3PkeYVm90x6azmE3DgQeHETieZOXntnyXW/bajiTuBCklebFvJHB iYBraTCP5Y9Sk5JfH+SOQurEqu/OZ95nx27t0kJrXauHdyrEIyLrlIEeCgxX8+gG DurTHCZ34OKkOzRAaCqKEVsVHiewh68fSqPR88Fc1ykAsZeLsrU= =y4cE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=3961