X-Message-Number: 3962
From:  (Thomas Donaldson)
Subject: Re: CryoNet #3898 - #3902
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 1995 21:31:18 -0800 (PST)



Hi!

>From the fact that the last set of messages on cryonet consisted of T bauge 
and myself, I guess I was very active. I'll be off the net for a while now,
though.

HOWEVER I'm very pleased by Mike's results as he reports them. From what I
know about memory, ultrastructural disruption isn't so important. Disruption
of neural connections would be critically important. But I've said this
before, haven't I ... But yes, that's just why Mike's work pleases me.

It hasn't been enough, really, just to know that there are scientific papers
which suggest that it is POSSIBLE to avoid destroying neural connections. 
If we are to be suspended, we want to know that the suspension methods that
will be used on us, at an absolute MINIMUM, must also not destroy neural
connections. And this kind of work looks like it shows that.

			Best and long long life to everyone,

				Thomas Donaldson

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=3962