X-Message-Number: 4115 Date: 31 Mar 95 08:58:43 EST From: yvan Bozzonetti <> Subject: Who are my readers ? Who are my readers? At first, the answer seems simple: They are computer users all over the world, living in 1995. Are they? I think not all of them enter in that definition. Some may be historians interested in cryonics ideas at the dawn of the technology, some may be cryonics' decision maker looking at the knowledge, psychology, choices or some other element of a particular author. There may be too some artificial systems, or uploaded brains exploring that kind of text. When I write, I try to produce a good reaction in my readers, that include both, the 1995 ones and the distant future users. For me, the second class is more important than the first, there are the people able to bring me to life after a cryonics sejourn. Think for example about politics: most 1995 readers are american capitalists with a strong disgust for communism. On the other side, China, is the economic success story of the ending 20 th century. It is a strong communist system with no presure to shift to anything else. Near 2002 it will be the first economy in the world, twenty years later its per capita gross domestic product will equates the american one... I have no objection towards communism and could adapt readily to it. Some cryonet users have tell me they prefer to be death than red. Not me, so please don't discard me on such a question. Yes that don't will sound good for most 1995 readers, they must keep in mind that fundamental fact: I write mostly for readers not even born in this century. May be this message will be the most 1995 oriented for some time. A thing I don't understand, is the lack of long term projects in the cryonics community. I am working on trees producing some return in three centuries, my shortest looking project will be completed in fifty years, the longest not before some millenia. It seem I am the only man on Earth with the will to do something on that time span. Am I the only potential cryonics user with a purpose? Now, some words for long time readers: I have some problems with simplectic Kruskal systems, mostly for Van der Waal as K3 tool. J1 seems a too complicated structure, I have not the over dodecaedron group, ( I can't prove it is a Kruskal effect). I don't understand the time window problem in K3. Y.B. Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=4115